Skip to content

Conversation

@jalbrekt85
Copy link
Collaborator

@jalbrekt85 jalbrekt85 commented Oct 28, 2025

@jalbrekt85 jalbrekt85 marked this pull request as draft October 28, 2025 19:44
@jalbrekt85 jalbrekt85 changed the title Ezkl fee split ezkl fee split logic Oct 28, 2025
@jalbrekt85
Copy link
Collaborator Author

this pr is branched from #225. that should be merged first, then we can rebase this branch with main

@jalbrekt85 jalbrekt85 marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2025 17:47
@jalbrekt85 jalbrekt85 requested a review from Xeonus November 6, 2025 01:45
@jalbrekt85
Copy link
Collaborator Author

running into issue with fetching block by timestamp on base. potential fix here: BalancerMaxis/bal_tools#144

@gosuto-inzasheru
Copy link
Contributor

fixed via BalancerMaxis/bal_tools#145

now running into FAILED tests/test_allocator.py::test_aura_bal_incentive_split - AssertionError: Aura share 0.0000 is too low

@gosuto-inzasheru
Copy link
Contributor

fixed via BalancerMaxis/multisig-ops#2520 (lido alliance pool is inflated in value and has killed gauge)

@gosuto-inzasheru gosuto-inzasheru merged commit 4d1291b into biweekly-runs Nov 6, 2025
7 of 12 checks passed
@gosuto-inzasheru gosuto-inzasheru deleted the ezkl-fee-split branch November 6, 2025 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants