fix: improve mobile layout for provider list #614
Conversation
- Use flex-wrap on mobile, flex-nowrap on desktop - Remove name truncation on mobile for better readability - Add mobile-specific metrics editing row (priority/weight/cost multiplier) - Increase touch target spacing (gap-3) for action buttons on mobile - Add visual separator between content and actions on mobile
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 Walkthrough走查该组件通过跨断点的响应式设计改进进行了增强，在小屏幕上引入了用于优先级、权重和成本倍数字段的移动端快速编辑 UI 部分，同时相应地调整了布局、对齐和文本截断行为。 变更
预计代码审查工作量🎯 3 (中等) | ⏱️ ~20 分钟 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @NieiR, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the mobile user experience for the provider list by implementing a responsive layout. It introduces inline editing for key provider metrics (priority, weight, cost multiplier) directly on mobile devices, a feature previously exclusive to desktop. Additionally, it refines touch target spacing and ensures full display of provider names, making the interface more intuitive and functional on smaller screens. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively improves the mobile layout for the provider list, making it much more usable on smaller screens. The use of responsive Tailwind CSS classes is well-executed to adapt the layout. Adding inline editing for metrics on mobile is a great feature enhancement. My main feedback is to address some code duplication that was introduced, which can be refactored to improve maintainability. Overall, great work on enhancing the mobile user experience.
| <div className="grid grid-cols-3 gap-4 text-center w-full md:hidden"> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <div className="text-xs text-muted-foreground">{tList("priority")}</div> | ||
| <div className="font-medium"> | ||
| {canEdit ? ( | ||
| <InlineEditPopover | ||
| value={provider.priority} | ||
| label={tInline("priorityLabel")} | ||
| type="integer" | ||
| validator={validatePriority} | ||
| onSave={handleSavePriority} | ||
| /> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <span>{provider.priority}</span> | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <div className="text-xs text-muted-foreground">{tList("weight")}</div> | ||
| <div className="font-medium"> | ||
| {canEdit ? ( | ||
| <InlineEditPopover | ||
| value={provider.weight} | ||
| label={tInline("weightLabel")} | ||
| type="integer" | ||
| validator={validateWeight} | ||
| onSave={handleSaveWeight} | ||
| /> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <span>{provider.weight}</span> | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <div className="text-xs text-muted-foreground">{tList("costMultiplier")}</div> | ||
| <div className="font-medium"> | ||
| {canEdit ? ( | ||
| <InlineEditPopover | ||
| value={provider.costMultiplier} | ||
| label={tInline("costMultiplierLabel")} | ||
| validator={validateCostMultiplier} | ||
| onSave={handleSaveCostMultiplier} | ||
| suffix="x" | ||
| type="number" | ||
| /> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <span>{provider.costMultiplier}x</span> | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This block of code for mobile metrics editing is identical to the desktop version (lines 482-532). To improve maintainability and reduce duplication, you can extract this JSX into a local component.
For example, you could define a MetricsEditor component inside ProviderRichListItem:
const MetricsEditor = () => (
<>
<div>
<div className="text-xs text-muted-foreground">{tList("priority")}</div>
<div className="font-medium">
{canEdit ? (
<InlineEditPopover
value={provider.priority}
label={tInline("priorityLabel")}
type="integer"
validator={validatePriority}
onSave={handleSavePriority}
/>
) : (
<span>{provider.priority}</span>
)}
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div className="text-xs text-muted-foreground">{tList("weight")}</div>
<div className="font-medium">
{canEdit ? (
<InlineEditPopover
value={provider.weight}
label={tInline("weightLabel")}
type="integer"
validator={validateWeight}
onSave={handleSaveWeight}
/>
) : (
<span>{provider.weight}</span>
)}
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div className="text-xs text-muted-foreground">{tList("costMultiplier")}</div>
<div className="font-medium">
{canEdit ? (
<InlineEditPopover
value={provider.costMultiplier}
label={tInline("costMultiplierLabel")}
validator={validateCostMultiplier}
onSave={handleSaveCostMultiplier}
suffix="x"
type="number"
/>
) : (
<span>{provider.costMultiplier}x</span>
)}
</div>
</div>
</>
);You can then use <MetricsEditor /> to replace the content of this div and the one for the desktop view, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review Summary
No significant issues identified in this PR. The changes are well-structured CSS/layout modifications that follow existing patterns in the codebase.
PR Size: S
- Lines changed: 61 (57 additions, 4 deletions)
- Files changed: 1
Analysis Notes
The PR adds mobile-responsive layout improvements:
- Responsive flex-wrap behavior (mobile wraps, desktop doesn't)
- Mobile-specific metrics editing section that mirrors the existing desktop implementation
- Improved touch target spacing for action buttons
- Visual separator between content and actions on mobile
The implementation correctly:
- Reuses existing
InlineEditPopovercomponent with identical props - Maintains proper i18n usage via
tListandtInlinetranslation hooks - Follows the same error handling patterns as the desktop version
- Uses Tailwind responsive prefixes (
md:) consistently
Review Coverage
- Logic and correctness - Clean
- Security (OWASP Top 10) - Clean
- Error handling - Clean (delegates to existing handlers)
- Type safety - Clean (no type changes)
- Documentation accuracy - Clean
- Test coverage - N/A (UI-only changes following existing patterns)
- Code clarity - Good
Automated review by Claude AI
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Backlog
to Done
in Claude Code Hub Roadmap
1 participant
Summary
Screenshots
Before
After
Changes
flex-wrapon mobile,flex-nowrapon desktop to allow natural content flowInlineEditPopoveras desktopgap-3) for touch-friendly interactionTest plan
Greptile Summary
This PR improves mobile UX for the provider list by adding responsive layout improvements and inline editing capabilities on mobile devices. The changes include:
priority,weight,cost_multiplier) using the existingInlineEditPopovercomponentgap-3instead ofgap-1The functionality remains intact and existing components are reused appropriately. However, the metrics editing section duplicates 51 lines of code between desktop and mobile views, which should be refactored into a shared component to improve maintainability.
Confidence Score: 4/5
InlineEditPopovercomponent is already tested and reused, so adding it to mobile is low-risk. The changes align with the PR description and testing checklist items are clearly defined.Important Files Changed
Sequence Diagram
sequenceDiagram actor User as Mobile User participant UI as Provider List Item participant Popover as InlineEditPopover participant Provider as editProvider Action participant Toast as Toast Notification Note over User,Toast: Mobile Layout Flow (< 768px) User->>UI: View provider on mobile Note over UI: Layout wraps with flex-wrap<br/>Name displays fully (no truncate)<br/>Metrics visible in 3-col grid User->>UI: Tap metrics editing (priority/weight/cost) UI->>Popover: Open InlineEditPopover for field Popover->>User: Show input with validation User->>Popover: Enter new value Popover->>Popover: Validate input alt Validation passes User->>Popover: Tap Save Popover->>Provider: Call editProvider(id, {field: value}) Provider->>Provider: Update provider on server Provider-->>Popover: Return success/error Popover->>Toast: Show success message Popover->>UI: Close and refresh else Validation fails Popover->>User: Show error message end User->>UI: Tap action buttons Note over UI: Full width buttons with<br/>increased gap (gap-3)<br/>Bordered separator on mobile UI->>UI: Toggle/Edit/Clone/Delete provider Note over User,Toast: Desktop Layout Flow (>= 768px) User->>UI: View provider on desktop Note over UI: Layout stays compact (flex-nowrap)<br/>Name truncates<br/>Metrics in compact column layout