Skip to content

Conversation

@mhoemmen
Copy link
Contributor

@mhoemmen mhoemmen commented Jul 15, 2024

@crtrott @dalg24 I submitted this today as P2897R3 (aligned_accessor).

PR #461 is P2897R2. Please merge that first; thanks!

Please merge this PR before merging PR #465 ; thanks!

mhoemmen added 5 commits July 10, 2024 14:18
Update based on further discussion with David Sankel.

* Rename `is_checkably_valid` to `detectably_invalid`
    (with inverted return value)

* Ask LEWG to consider the alternative design that makes
    `is_sufficiently_aligned` a nonmember function in `<bit>`
    instead of a member function of `aligned_accessor`,
    while LWG review of R2 proceeds concurrently

* P2389R2 was voted into the Working Draft at St. Louis,
    so replace use of `dextents` in examples with `dims`.

* Minor formatting and non-wording fixes
Add non-wording section explaining why `aligned_accessor`
has no `explicit` constructor from less to more alignment.
@mhoemmen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by PR #465 .

@mhoemmen mhoemmen closed this Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant