Add TLA+ spec for core concurrency of spec #484
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
git ignore states folder Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR comes out of the blue, but I think it could be useful.
It adds a TLA+ spec for what I think is the core concurrent part of the spec: the transaction and connection lifecycle.
As background: I am involved in the efforts at Servo to implement the latest spec, and I found how the above is specified to be quite ambiguous at first. Once you've internalized the spec and thought about it, I think it all makes sense, but the benefit of expressing this in TLA+ is that it abstracts away everything else and provides you with an unambiguous description of the concurrent part that a machine can check.
Note sure how to integrate this in the actual spec; maybe via a note and a link to the file in the repo?
For your consideration.