Conversation
Signed-off-by: YaoZengzeng <yaozengzeng@huawei.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @YaoZengzeng, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on upgrading the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the agent-sandbox dependency from v0.1.0 to v0.1.1, with the changes correctly applied in getting-started.md and run_e2e.sh. No security vulnerabilities were found in the provided code changes. For improved maintainability, I suggest using a shell variable for the version number in the documentation's example commands to simplify future updates.
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #200 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 35.60% 35.77% +0.16%
==========================================
Files 29 29
Lines 2533 2549 +16
==========================================
+ Hits 902 912 +10
- Misses 1505 1511 +6
Partials 126 126
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Signed-off-by: YaoZengzeng <yaozengzeng@huawei.com>
|
@hzxuzhonghu ptal |
|
One more place to consider: |
Yes, I notice this one as well. But seems not influence all the functions according to the test result. So decide to update in the future if necessary. |
|
FYI there is a typo in agent-sandbox v0.1.0 ("SanboxPodNameAnnotation"). It is fixed upstream in v0.1.1. I opened a quick follow-up to bump the dependency and update our usages: #201. Please take a look when you have a chance. |
|
ping @hzxuzhonghu |
4 participants
What type of PR is this?
/kind enhancement
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #128
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: