Skip to content

Comments

Add system questions reference to tenant recipes page#396

Merged
sethesterline merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/392-tenant-recipe-system-questions
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

Add system questions reference to tenant recipes page#396
sethesterline merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/392-tenant-recipe-system-questions

Conversation

@jasnoyaeger
Copy link
Member

@jasnoyaeger jasnoyaeger commented Feb 19, 2026

Summary

  • Add a complete System Questions Reference section to the Tenant Recipes page documenting all 23 built-in system questions across 4 sections (Tenant, Nodes, Network)
  • Each question includes its variable name, display label, type, default value, and whether it is enabled by default
  • Includes a tip noting that custom questions (e.g., expiration dates) can be added beyond the built-in set

Context

  • All 23 system questions were validated by creating a test tenant recipe on a live VergeOS 26.1.2 system and capturing the full questions list
  • Issue 1 (remove stale POC reference) is addressed separately in PR Remove outdated 30-Day Trial (POC) recipe reference #395
  • Notable finding: the "Expiration Date" question mentioned in the issue does not exist as a built-in system question — it would need to be created as a custom question

Test plan

  • Verify the tenant recipes page renders correctly at /product-guide/automation/tenant-recipes/
  • Confirm all three reference tables (Tenant, Nodes, Network) display properly
  • Verify the tip admonition at the end of the section renders correctly

Addresses #392

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add a complete reference table of all 23 built-in system questions
that are automatically generated when creating a tenant recipe,
organized by section (Tenant, Nodes, Network). Each question lists
its name, display label, type, default value, and whether it is
enabled by default. Validated against a live VergeOS 26.1.2 system.

Addresses Issue 2 in #392

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@sethesterline sethesterline left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested offline. looks good

@sethesterline sethesterline merged commit 393d3ef into main Feb 19, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants