Skip to content

Conversation

@fogelito
Copy link
Contributor

@fogelito fogelito commented Jul 10, 2025

Test the boolean default value.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced document update tests to include a boolean attribute, ensuring its correct handling during batch updates.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The test method testUpdateDocuments in the end-to-end test suite was updated to include a new boolean attribute in the collection schema and in the test documents. Additional assertions were added to verify the correct handling of this boolean attribute during batch document updates.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/e2e/Adapter/Scopes/DocumentTests.php Enhanced testUpdateDocuments to add and test a boolean attribute in schema and document updates

Poem

In the warren of tests, a new field appears,
A boolean hop, dispelling old fears.
True in the meadow, false in the den,
The rabbits ensure it works again and again.
With every update, we check and we cheer—
For code that is clear, and bugs disappear! 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb2f759 and 157f0cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/Adapter/Scopes/DocumentTests.php (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Docker Image
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/e2e/Adapter/Scopes/DocumentTests.php (4)

3536-3546: LGTM! Well-structured boolean attribute definition.

The boolean attribute definition follows the correct pattern with appropriate default value configuration. Testing with default: false and required: false provides good coverage for boolean attribute handling in batch operations.


3558-3560: Good test data setup with boolean override.

Setting 'boolean' => true in the created documents effectively tests that explicit values override the attribute's default value (false). This setup ensures the subsequent bulk update tests verify that boolean fields retain their values correctly.


3577-3577: Essential assertion for boolean attribute persistence.

This assertion correctly verifies that the boolean attribute retains its original value (true) after the bulk update operation, ensuring that fields not explicitly updated are preserved properly.


3589-3589: Comprehensive verification of boolean attribute handling.

This assertion provides additional coverage by verifying boolean attribute persistence after the bulk update operation on the retrieved documents, ensuring data integrity throughout the update process.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@fogelito fogelito closed this Jul 20, 2025
@fogelito fogelito reopened this Jul 20, 2025
@fogelito fogelito requested a review from abnegate July 20, 2025 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants