Skip to content

Conversation

@pull
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Apr 1, 2025

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.1)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

…10464 (#10656)

Reverts #10464

While this change improved the situation for uvloop users, it caused a
regression with `SelectorEventLoop` (issue #10617)

The alternative fix is MagicStack/uvloop#646
(not merged at the time of this PR)

issue #10617 appears to be very similar to
python/cpython@d5aeccf

If someone can come up with a working reproducer for #10617 we can
revisit this.
cc @top-oai

Minimal implementation that shows on cancellation the socket is cleaned
up without the explicit `close`
#10617 (comment)
so this should be unneeded unless I've missed something (very possible
with all the moving parts here)

## Related issue number

fixes #10617
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Apr 1, 2025
@pull pull bot merged commit 06db052 into tj-python:master Apr 1, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 1, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.71%. Comparing base (f3b0610) to head (06db052).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #186      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.71%   98.71%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         125      125              
  Lines       37462    37439      -23     
  Branches     2076     2076              
==========================================
- Hits        36980    36957      -23     
  Misses        335      335              
  Partials      147      147              
Flag Coverage Δ
CI-GHA 98.59% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
OS-Linux 98.25% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
OS-Windows 96.18% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
OS-macOS 97.36% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.10.11 97.27% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.10.16 97.82% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.11.11 97.90% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.11.9 97.35% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.12.9 98.36% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.13.2 98.34% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.9.13 97.14% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.9.21 97.67% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-pypy7.3.16 85.75% <100.00%> (-7.28%) ⬇️
VM-macos 97.36% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
VM-ubuntu 98.25% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
VM-windows 96.18% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants