Increasing log level for IoP#4633
Merged
Lennonka merged 7 commits intotheforeman:masterfrom Feb 19, 2026
Merged
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
Needs tech review
|
The PR preview for c333e6f is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-4633.surge.sh The following output files are affected by this PR: |
chris1984
reviewed
Feb 4, 2026
Member
chris1984
left a comment
chris1984
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Left some comments to help with your PR
guides/common/modules/proc_increasing-the-logging-level-for-insights-iop.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/common/modules/proc_increasing-the-logging-level-for-insights-iop.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
guides/common/modules/proc_increasing-the-logging-level-for-insights-iop.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Lennonka
commented
Feb 5, 2026
guides/common/modules/proc_increasing-the-logging-level-for-insights-iop.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Lennonka
commented
Feb 5, 2026
guides/common/modules/proc_increasing-the-logging-level-for-insights-iop.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Contributor
Author
|
@chris1984 Is the same doc update applicable to Sat 6.18? |
Member
No it's not, unless we decide to backport it. I guess for now until we are given that direction we just put it in the Sat 6.19 docs. If I hear anything about a backport, I will make a follow up Jira |
Contributor
Author
|
@chris1984 Final ack, please? |
Contributor
maximiliankolb
left a comment
maximiliankolb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One tiny suggestion.
guides/common/modules/proc_increasing-the-logging-level-for-insights-iop.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Lennonka
commented
Feb 10, 2026
guides/common/modules/proc_increasing-the-logging-level-for-insights-iop.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
maximiliankolb
added
style review done
Lennonka
added
tech review done
Lennonka
changed the title
synkd
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2026
synkd
left a comment
synkd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ACK from Satellite QE, the changes in this PR match our recently-merged test here: SatelliteQE/robottelo#20815
Lennonka
added
testing done
Lennonka
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2026
Contributor
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes are you introducing?
Adding a procedure to increase the logging level for Insights IoP services
Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)
New feature
Documents theforeman/puppet-iop#90
SAT-42054 (public)
Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)
Contributor checklists
Please cherry-pick my commits into: