Skip to content

Conversation

@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member

What changes are you introducing?

Adding a new Cursor command that should determine whether a code PR has documentation impact and also suggest changes to cover the impact.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

Efficiency.

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

The command is based on an instruction for Cursor that I have used a few times in the past and it worked quite nicely. I'm currently testing a modified version of the original instruction as a Cursor command and will keep this PR as a draft until I've tried it enough times to see that it provides good results. I'm sharing it early like this in case anyone else would like to start testing it too and share feedback on their results.

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.17/Katello 4.19
  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18; orcharhino 7.6)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4; orcharhino 7.5)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.12.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Jan 2, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

The PR preview for d9ba7b0 is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-4558.surge.sh

The following output files are affected by this PR:

show diff

show diff as HTML

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Not yet reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant