Conversation
… table ref conflict
🧹 PR Environment Cleaned UpThe PR environment has been successfully deleted. Deleted Resources:
All resources have been cleaned up and will no longer incur costs. |
ℹ️ No PR Environment to Clean UpNo PR environment was found for this PR. This is expected if:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
logSummaryderived subquery infetchWorkflowRunsto only aggregate logs for the current org's executions within the time rangeINsubquery (scopedExecutionIds) instead ofinnerJoin(workflowExecutions)to avoid Drizzle's table reference conflict when the same table appears in both a.as()subquery and the outer queryWithout this fix, the subquery either scans the entire
workflow_execution_logstable (performance regression) or throws "tried to reference field from a subquery" at runtime when scoped viainnerJoin.Test plan