Skip to content

Conversation

@rbuckton
Copy link
Contributor

In an effort to make review more manageable, this extracts the remaining tests specific to using statement syntax from #3866

@rbuckton rbuckton requested a review from a team as a code owner May 12, 2025 15:48
Copy link
Contributor

@ptomato ptomato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since I just reviewed the await using PR, this went fairly quickly. Please apply all the comments there to this PR as well.

@rbuckton rbuckton force-pushed the explicit-resource-management-using-syntax branch from d1528c9 to f56e3f7 Compare June 2, 2025 17:44
Copy link
Contributor

@ptomato ptomato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one question to resolve, otherwise merge ready.

@rbuckton rbuckton force-pushed the explicit-resource-management-using-syntax branch from a1bffe6 to 7f71843 Compare November 3, 2025 21:09
@ptomato ptomato force-pushed the explicit-resource-management-using-syntax branch from 28ad4b5 to e2e1751 Compare November 4, 2025 16:41
Copy link
Contributor

@ptomato ptomato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm assuming the ReferenceError was the only thing that changed, I reviewed the rest a while ago.

@ptomato ptomato merged commit b56fb90 into tc39:main Nov 4, 2025
12 checks passed
@rbuckton rbuckton deleted the explicit-resource-management-using-syntax branch November 4, 2025 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants