Skip to content

Conversation

@rbuckton
Copy link
Contributor

In an effort to make review more manageable, this extracts the remaining tests specific to await using statement syntax from #3866

@rbuckton rbuckton requested a review from a team as a code owner May 12, 2025 15:44
Copy link
Contributor

@ptomato ptomato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I learned a lot reviewing this PR. Thanks!

@rbuckton rbuckton force-pushed the explicit-resource-management-await-using-syntax branch from 1c7f1de to bd747be Compare June 2, 2025 17:07
Copy link
Contributor

@ptomato ptomato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm assuming the ReferenceError was the only thing that changed, I reviewed the rest a while ago.

@ptomato ptomato force-pushed the explicit-resource-management-await-using-syntax branch from 799cd44 to 8938fb6 Compare November 4, 2025 16:59
@ptomato ptomato merged commit 134a8ea into tc39:main Nov 4, 2025
12 checks passed
@rbuckton rbuckton deleted the explicit-resource-management-await-using-syntax branch November 4, 2025 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants