Skip to content

Conversation

@rbuckton
Copy link
Contributor

In an effort to make review more manageable, this extracts the remaining tests specific to await using semantics from #3866

@rbuckton rbuckton requested a review from a team as a code owner May 12, 2025 15:43
@rbuckton rbuckton changed the title [explicit-resource-management] Add remaining tests specific to await-using semantics [explicit-resource-management] Add remaining tests specific to await using statement semantics May 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@arai-a arai-a left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested on SpiderMonkey, and 4 tests fail

@rbuckton rbuckton force-pushed the explicit-resource-management-await-using branch from d2b28bc to 664a84c Compare November 11, 2025 19:15
@rbuckton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @arai-a, should be fixed now.

@ptomato
Copy link
Contributor

ptomato commented Nov 13, 2025

Since this has been reviewed by someone involved in the implementation, I would be comfortable to merge it now, to avoid holding it up any further. I personally won't have the bandwidth to get around to it in the near future. @gibson042 @ljharb @Ms2ger What do you think?

@ptomato ptomato enabled auto-merge (squash) January 22, 2026 18:35
Copy link
Contributor

@ptomato ptomato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

proxying arai-a's review

@ptomato ptomato force-pushed the explicit-resource-management-await-using branch from 557f298 to 5d94a30 Compare January 22, 2026 18:36
@ptomato ptomato merged commit 3c6180f into tc39:main Jan 22, 2026
14 checks passed
@rbuckton rbuckton deleted the explicit-resource-management-await-using branch January 22, 2026 18:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants