Skip to content

Conversation

@PranathiDeepak
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Correctness:

    • Problem1.sql: The solution correctly identifies consecutive periods of 'failed' and 'succeeded' states in 2019. The use of window functions and grouping by the difference between ranks is a standard approach for this type of problem.
    • Problem2.sql: The solution correctly pivots the student data by continent using row numbers for alignment. This is a valid approach for the problem.
    • Problem3.sql: The solution correctly compares department averages to company averages by month. The CASE statement handles the comparison logic well.
    • Problem4.sql: The solution correctly identifies the first login date for each player using RANK().
  2. Time Complexity:

    • All solutions use window functions (RANK(), ROW_NUMBER()) which typically run in O(n log n) time due to sorting.
    • The grouping operations in Problem1.sql and Problem3.sql add additional O(n) complexity.
    • Overall time complexity is reasonable for these problems.
  3. Space Complexity:

    • The CTEs create temporary tables in memory, but they're necessary for the solutions.
    • Space complexity is O(n) for all solutions, which is expected for these problems.
  4. Code Quality:

    • Strengths:
      • Consistent use of CTEs for better readability.
      • Proper use of window functions.
      • Good column aliasing.
    • Areas for improvement:
      • Problem1.sql: The subquery could be named more descriptively than 'y'.
      • Problem2.sql: The RIGHT JOIN could be confusing; a FULL OUTER JOIN would be more intuitive but isn't available in MySQL.
      • Problem4.sql: The RANK() could be replaced with ROW_NUMBER() since we only need the first row.
  5. Efficiency:

    • Problem1.sql: Could add an index on the date columns for better performance.
    • Problem2.sql: The multiple CTEs are necessary but could be optimized with proper indexing on the continent column.
    • Problem3.sql: The JOIN between companyAvg and deptAvg is efficient.
    • Problem4.sql: Adding an index on (player_id, event_date) would improve performance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants