Skip to content

Conversation

@Priygupt13
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

Let's evaluate each file separately:

Exercise_1.java (Array-based Stack):

  • Correctness: The implementation correctly handles stack operations (push, pop, peek, isEmpty) with proper edge case checks. The stack overflow check in push() has a minor issue (should be top >= MAX-1 instead of top >= MAX).
  • Time Complexity: Correctly stated as O(1) for all operations.
  • Space Complexity: Correctly stated as O(N) where N is MAX.
  • Code Quality: Well-structured and readable. Good use of comments and consistent formatting.
  • Efficiency: The implementation is efficient for a fixed-size stack. The overflow check could be more precise.

Exercise_2.java (Linked List-based Stack):

  • Correctness: Correctly implements stack operations using linked list. Properly handles edge cases like empty stack.
  • Time Complexity: Correctly stated as O(1) for all operations.
  • Space Complexity: Correctly stated as O(N) where N is number of elements.
  • Code Quality: Clean and well-organized. Good use of static nested class for StackNode.
  • Efficiency: Efficient implementation with constant time operations.

Exercise_3.java (Linked List):

  • Correctness: The insert() method works correctly, but printList() has serious issues (infinite loop and incorrect variable usage - 'head' instead of 'currNode').
  • Time Complexity: Insert is correctly O(n), but print is incorrectly implemented.
  • Space Complexity: Correctly stated as O(1) for insert.
  • Code Quality: The printList() method needs significant improvement. Variable naming and logic are confusing.
  • Efficiency: The printList() method would be inefficient due to the infinite loop issue.

General Strengths:

  • Good documentation of time and space complexity
  • Proper handling of edge cases in stack implementations
  • Clean code structure in Exercise_1 and Exercise_2

Areas for Improvement:

  • Fix the stack overflow check in Exercise_1
  • Completely rewrite the printList() method in Exercise_3
  • Ensure consistent variable naming (e.g., in Exercise_3 printList())
  • Add more comments explaining the logic in complex parts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants