Skip to content

Sentiment Without Structure: When Order Flow Carries More Information Than Textual Sentiment | DAI-2507 | Dissensus AI Working Paper

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

studiofarzulla/sentiment-without-structure

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

7 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Sentiment Without Structure

Differential Liquidity Response to Infrastructure vs Regulatory Events in Cryptocurrency Markets

DOI License: CC BY 4.0 Status

Working Paper DAI-2507 | Dissensus AI

Abstract

We investigate differential market responses to infrastructure versus regulatory events in cryptocurrency markets using event study methodology with 4-category event classification. From 50 candidate events (2019--2025), 31 meet inclusion criteria across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Cardano. We employ constant mean and market-adjusted models with event-level block bootstrap confidence intervals that properly account for cross-sectional correlation.

Our primary comparison focuses on negative-valence events: infrastructure failures (8 events) versus regulatory enforcement (7 events). Infrastructure failures produce mean Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAR) of -7.6% (95% CI: [-25.8%, +11.3%]) and regulatory enforcement produces mean CAR of -11.1% (CI: [-31.0%, +10.7%]). The difference of +3.6 percentage points has CI [-25.3%, +30.9%], p = 0.81 -- a null finding indicating markets respond similarly to both shock types when controlling for valence.

Robustness checks confirm consistent results across window specifications, leave-one-out exclusion of major events (FTX, Terra), and alternative market model specifications. The 4-category classification addresses prior conflation of upgrades with failures. This exploratory analysis should be treated as hypothesis-generating.

Key Findings

Finding Result
Infrastructure failures (N=8) mean CAR -7.6%
Regulatory enforcement (N=7) mean CAR -11.1%
Difference +3.6 pp (p = 0.81)
Primary result Null finding -- markets respond similarly to both shock types
Robustness Consistent across 8 alternative specifications

Repository Structure

sentiment-without-structure/
├── paper/                           # LaTeX source and compiled PDF
├── src/                             # Analysis code
│   ├── config.py                    # Configuration
│   ├── data_fetcher.py              # Binance OHLCV fetcher
│   ├── event_study.py               # Event study models
│   └── robustness.py                # Bootstrap & robustness checks
├── scripts/                         # Analysis scripts
│   ├── run_main_analysis.py         # Primary analysis
│   ├── run_corrected_bootstrap.py   # Event-equal-weighted bootstrap
│   ├── run_im_test.py               # Ibragimov-Muller test
│   ├── run_nonoverlap_analysis.py   # Overlap robustness
│   └── run_black_thursday_sensitivity.py  # Classification sensitivity
├── data/                            # Event sample with classifications
└── outputs/                         # JSON results for all analyses

Replication

pip install pandas numpy scipy requests

python scripts/run_main_analysis.py
python scripts/run_corrected_bootstrap.py
python scripts/run_im_test.py
python scripts/run_nonoverlap_analysis.py

Keywords

Cryptocurrency, Event Study, Regulation, Infrastructure Risk, Block Bootstrap

Citation

@article{farzulla2026sentiment,
  title={Sentiment Without Structure: Differential Liquidity Response to Infrastructure vs Regulatory Events in Cryptocurrency Markets},
  author={Farzulla, Murad},
  year={2026},
  doi={10.5281/zenodo.18099609},
  url={https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18099609},
  note={With Editor at Digital Finance (Springer)}
}

Authors

License

Paper content: CC-BY-4.0

About

Sentiment Without Structure: When Order Flow Carries More Information Than Textual Sentiment | DAI-2507 | Dissensus AI Working Paper

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 2

  •  
  •