Differential Liquidity Response to Infrastructure vs Regulatory Events in Cryptocurrency Markets
Working Paper DAI-2507 | Dissensus AI
We investigate differential market responses to infrastructure versus regulatory events in cryptocurrency markets using event study methodology with 4-category event classification. From 50 candidate events (2019--2025), 31 meet inclusion criteria across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Cardano. We employ constant mean and market-adjusted models with event-level block bootstrap confidence intervals that properly account for cross-sectional correlation.
Our primary comparison focuses on negative-valence events: infrastructure failures (8 events) versus regulatory enforcement (7 events). Infrastructure failures produce mean Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAR) of -7.6% (95% CI: [-25.8%, +11.3%]) and regulatory enforcement produces mean CAR of -11.1% (CI: [-31.0%, +10.7%]). The difference of +3.6 percentage points has CI [-25.3%, +30.9%], p = 0.81 -- a null finding indicating markets respond similarly to both shock types when controlling for valence.
Robustness checks confirm consistent results across window specifications, leave-one-out exclusion of major events (FTX, Terra), and alternative market model specifications. The 4-category classification addresses prior conflation of upgrades with failures. This exploratory analysis should be treated as hypothesis-generating.
| Finding | Result |
|---|---|
| Infrastructure failures (N=8) mean CAR | -7.6% |
| Regulatory enforcement (N=7) mean CAR | -11.1% |
| Difference | +3.6 pp (p = 0.81) |
| Primary result | Null finding -- markets respond similarly to both shock types |
| Robustness | Consistent across 8 alternative specifications |
sentiment-without-structure/
├── paper/ # LaTeX source and compiled PDF
├── src/ # Analysis code
│ ├── config.py # Configuration
│ ├── data_fetcher.py # Binance OHLCV fetcher
│ ├── event_study.py # Event study models
│ └── robustness.py # Bootstrap & robustness checks
├── scripts/ # Analysis scripts
│ ├── run_main_analysis.py # Primary analysis
│ ├── run_corrected_bootstrap.py # Event-equal-weighted bootstrap
│ ├── run_im_test.py # Ibragimov-Muller test
│ ├── run_nonoverlap_analysis.py # Overlap robustness
│ └── run_black_thursday_sensitivity.py # Classification sensitivity
├── data/ # Event sample with classifications
└── outputs/ # JSON results for all analyses
pip install pandas numpy scipy requests
python scripts/run_main_analysis.py
python scripts/run_corrected_bootstrap.py
python scripts/run_im_test.py
python scripts/run_nonoverlap_analysis.pyCryptocurrency, Event Study, Regulation, Infrastructure Risk, Block Bootstrap
@article{farzulla2026sentiment,
title={Sentiment Without Structure: Differential Liquidity Response to Infrastructure vs Regulatory Events in Cryptocurrency Markets},
author={Farzulla, Murad},
year={2026},
doi={10.5281/zenodo.18099609},
url={https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18099609},
note={With Editor at Digital Finance (Springer)}
}- Murad Farzulla -- Dissensus AI & King's College London
- ORCID: 0009-0002-7164-8704
- Email: murad@dissensus.ai
Paper content: CC-BY-4.0