Update for jdk1.7.0 >= u25: use CallerSensitive annotation

[oleastre]

I had like many others problem running grails applications using the latest jdk version.

As I still have problems with the fedora openjdk (based on and early icedtea 2.3.10), I tried to replace the getCallerClass(depth) calls with the new CallerSensitive annotation (see http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/176).

This pull request is a proof of concept that breaks compatibility with older jdk releases, but can be useful for future jdk updates.

Tests seems to pass and grails applications are running correctly.

[ghost]

Please can you explain better what I have to do? Sorry for my ignorance, I'm really disappointed for this bug.

[oleastre]

I suppose you are coming from the grails bug report.

You can either try to clone my branch of spring-loaded, compile and package it yourself.
Or use the jar file I putted there: http://www.oleastre.be/export/springloaded-1.1.3.jar (without any warranty it works)

Then replace the grails 2.2.3 springloaded jar with the new one (as explaine in grails jira.)

[ghost]

On 19 July 2013 00:03, Olivier Samyn notifications@github.com wrote:

I suppose you are coming from the grails bug report.

You can either try to clone my branch of spring-loaded, compile and
package it yourself.
Or use the jar file I putted there:
http://www.oleastre.be/export/springloaded-1.1.3.jar (without any
warranty it works)

Then replace the grails 2.2.3 springloaded jar with the new one (as
explaine in grails jira.)

I don't find springloaded-1.1.3.jar but

./lib/org.springsource.springloaded/springloaded-core/jars/springloaded-core-1.1.3.jar

[ghost]

yesssssssssssssss, I've copied and renamed to springloaded-core-1.1.3.jar your file and all seems to work.
Really thank you soooooooooo much :)

[aclement]

I'd rather not break the behaviour on the older JDKs at the moment, so we need a fix that doesn't cause that problem. But I guess I could put this into a branch of the main repo as I'm not sure when I'll have time to do a proper solution that supports old and new jdk levels.

[rascio]

Hi,
Is there any news/update for this problem?

[arthinking]

So the this solution is above written by oleastre ? :-D