Skip to content

Conversation

@Vladyslav-Kuksiuk
Copy link
Contributor

@Vladyslav-Kuksiuk Vladyslav-Kuksiuk commented Mar 10, 2023

This PR adds an implementation of the user blocking and unblocking flows.

User blocking flow model:
image

User unblocking flow model:
image

Copy link
Contributor

@armiol armiol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Vladyslav-Kuksiuk please make sure to do the following things:

  1. review this PR by yourself, and do that really-really thoroughly;

  2. next time perform p.1 before submitting a PR.

*/

/**
* Provides ChatSPN `User` commands and common commands interfaces.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't use back-ticks in Javadoc. We use {@code ...}.

And another thing is that I don't understand why you want to have a monospaced don't here.

Please review.

Same goes for the similar cases within this PR.

string name = 2 [(required) = true];
}

// A new user chats has been created.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is hardly a piece of English.

Please do better.


import "spine/core/user_id.proto";

// A user profile view in the chatting system.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

?

Please make sure to review your own work before submitting a PR.

@Vladyslav-Kuksiuk Vladyslav-Kuksiuk changed the title Implement UserChats creation flow Implement user blocking/unblocking flow Mar 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@armiol armiol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Vladyslav-Kuksiuk as discussed vocally, BlockUser does not to make much sense if sent to User aggregate, since it introduces some discrepancy (i.e. who blocks whom?). So please return to this PR later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants