grape v3 compatibility #180
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
We usually only do that if we know there's a limitation. |
dblock
requested changes
Dec 10, 2025
Collaborator
dblock
left a comment
dblock
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor CHANGELOG and good to go. Thanks!
Co-authored-by: Daniel (dB.) Doubrovkine <dblock@dblock.org>
dblock
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
saw these minor deprecations/removals when checking if
slack-ruby-bot-serverwas compatible after bumping the dependencies in a project.https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape/blob/master/UPGRADING.md#upgrading-to--300
specifically ruby-grape/grape#2573
everything else does not seem like it's affecting this?
do we wanna pin grape to
< 4just in case?scope
replace deprecated
rack_responsewitherror!