Add processing time #32
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @puja-trivedi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the application's observability by integrating processing time measurements into key functions. Specifically, it introduces logging for the duration of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds processing time measurements to the align_structured_information and judge_alignment methods. The implementation is straightforward. My main feedback is to use time.perf_counter() instead of time.time() for more accurate and reliable timing, as detailed in the comments. Using time.time() can lead to incorrect measurements if the system clock is adjusted. Additionally, to improve maintainability and reduce code duplication in the future, you could consider encapsulating the timing logic in a reusable context manager.
|
|
||
| logger.info("Starting alignment process") | ||
|
|
||
| start_time_align = time.time() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For measuring performance and duration of code execution, it's better to use time.perf_counter() instead of time.time(). time.time() is based on the system's wall-clock time, which can be adjusted (e.g., by NTP), potentially leading to inaccurate or even negative time differences. time.perf_counter() provides a high-resolution monotonic clock that is unaffected by system time changes, making it ideal for timing operations.
| start_time_align = time.time() | |
| start_time_align = time.perf_counter() |
| # Update shared state with the correct structure | ||
| self._update_shared_state("aligned_terms", wrapped_result) | ||
| logger.info(f"Alignment complete with aligned data") | ||
| end_time_align = time.time() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As mentioned in a previous comment, time.perf_counter() should be used here for consistency and to ensure accurate duration measurement.
| end_time_align = time.time() | |
| end_time_align = time.perf_counter() |
| return None | ||
|
|
||
| logger.info("Starting judgment of aligned information") | ||
| start_time_judge = time.time() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For consistency and to ensure accurate duration measurement, please use time.perf_counter() here as well. time.time() can be unreliable for measuring durations due to system clock adjustments.
| start_time_judge = time.time() | |
| start_time_judge = time.perf_counter() |
|
|
||
| self._update_shared_state("judged_terms", wrapped_result) | ||
| logger.info(f"Judgment complete with judged data") | ||
| end_time_judge = time.time() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As with the start time, please use time.perf_counter() to ensure the duration calculation is accurate and monotonic.
| end_time_judge = time.time() | |
| end_time_judge = time.perf_counter() |
puja-trivedi
changed the base branch from
main
to
dependency_resolution_error
puja-trivedi
changed the base branch from
dependency_resolution_error
to
main
No description provided.