-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
[Snyk] Fix for 3 vulnerabilities #1232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-14157807 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-14157810 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-SQLPARSE-14157217
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR aims to fix 3 security vulnerabilities identified by Snyk by updating django (from 3.2.25 to 4.2.27) and sqlparse (from 0.4.4 to 0.5.4) in the production requirements. However, the PR introduces a critical dependency conflict that will prevent successful installation.
Key Issues
- Critical conflict: Django version constraint added to
production.txtconflicts with existingdjango==5.2.7inbase.txt - Updated
sqlparseto address security vulnerability - Minor formatting inconsistency in comment style
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
|
||
| setuptools>=68.2.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability | ||
| setuptools>=68.2.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability | ||
| django>=4.2.27 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability |
Copilot
AI
Dec 4, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding django>=4.2.27 here creates a conflict with the existing Django version specified in base.txt (line 19: django==5.2.7). Since production.txt includes base.txt via -r base.txt (line 9), this will cause dependency resolution conflicts.
The Django version in base.txt is already 5.2.7, which is newer than 4.2.27 and should already address the security vulnerabilities fixed in 4.2.27. This line should be removed, or if a security vulnerability exists in Django 5.2.7, the version in base.txt should be updated instead.
| django>=4.2.27 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability |
| setuptools>=68.2.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability | ||
| setuptools>=68.2.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability | ||
| django>=4.2.27 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability | ||
| sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability |
Copilot
AI
Dec 4, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing space after # in the comment. For consistency with other comments in this file (e.g., line 44 and throughout the file), there should be a space between # and the comment text.
| sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability | |
| sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability |
Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.
Snyk changed the following file(s):
requirements/production.txtImportant
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic
Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:
🦉 SQL Injection
🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling