Skip to content

Conversation

@robertatakenaka
Copy link
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements/production.txt
⚠️ Warning
django-anymail 11.1 requires django, which is not installed.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 SQL Injection
🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 4, 2025 15:01
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR aims to fix 3 security vulnerabilities identified by Snyk by updating django (from 3.2.25 to 4.2.27) and sqlparse (from 0.4.4 to 0.5.4) in the production requirements. However, the PR introduces a critical dependency conflict that will prevent successful installation.

Key Issues

  • Critical conflict: Django version constraint added to production.txt conflicts with existing django==5.2.7 in base.txt
  • Updated sqlparse to address security vulnerability
  • Minor formatting inconsistency in comment style

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.


setuptools>=68.2.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
setuptools>=68.2.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
django>=4.2.27 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding django>=4.2.27 here creates a conflict with the existing Django version specified in base.txt (line 19: django==5.2.7). Since production.txt includes base.txt via -r base.txt (line 9), this will cause dependency resolution conflicts.

The Django version in base.txt is already 5.2.7, which is newer than 4.2.27 and should already address the security vulnerabilities fixed in 4.2.27. This line should be removed, or if a security vulnerability exists in Django 5.2.7, the version in base.txt should be updated instead.

Suggested change
django>=4.2.27 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
setuptools>=68.2.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
setuptools>=68.2.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
django>=4.2.27 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing space after # in the comment. For consistency with other comments in this file (e.g., line 44 and throughout the file), there should be a space between # and the comment text.

Suggested change
sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants