tests: misc coverage for calendar.rs, der.rs#71
tests: misc coverage for calendar.rs, der.rs#71cpu merged 2 commits intorustls:mainfrom cpu:cpu-adopt-some-coverage
Conversation
Ah! I keep forgetting |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #71 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.08% 95.34% +0.25%
==========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 2604 2684 +80
==========================================
+ Hits 2476 2559 +83
+ Misses 128 125 -3
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
I forget, why is that again? (https://twitter.com/weihanglo/status/1661680417643143169 should help, eventually.) |
There's a helper script I keep forgetting to use, ( Lines 21 to 35 in 6a388ac
Oh cool. That will be a nice feature. |
|
Right, I meant, I forget why we don't have those in the crate root as inner attributes like we do for other stuff. |
Ahhh, I understand. Some @djc I could open a separate PR to move back to that approach if you think it's worthwhile. It would reduce some dev. friction 👍 |
|
Yeah, I think that would be an improvement. I'd probably just get rid of the helper script. |
I was looking at some of the open PRs on the original
briansmith/webpkirepo and spotted two small ones adding bits of test coverage:The unit tests look good to me and more test coverage seems appealing so I've cherry-picked the original commits onto our fork and squashed each down into 1 commit per area of coverage (and fixed a couple
clippyerrs).Thanks @st3fan for the original implementation! :-)