Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Jan 21, 2026

Fixes #151411.

Seems like the ICE was already solved by #151255. Well in any case, more regression tests won't hurt.

r? @lolbinarycat

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 21, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 21, 2026

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • There are issue links (such as #123) in the commit messages of the following commits.
    Please move them to the PR description, to avoid spamming the issues with references to the commit, and so this bot can automatically canonicalize them to avoid issues with subtree.

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez changed the title Add regression test for #151411 [rustdoc] Add regression test for #151411 Jan 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ICE]: rustdoc panics with "no resolutions for a doc link" when resolving intra-doc link in #[deprecated] note via glob re-export

3 participants