Skip to content

Conversation

@nebay-abraha
Copy link
Contributor

@nebay-abraha nebay-abraha commented Jul 31, 2025

Update GitHub Actions workflow to run CodeQL analysis and unit tests on pull requests or (manually trigger)

- Renames workflow file to ci-codeql-tests.yml for clarity
- Upgrades CodeQL actions to v3
- Adds Poetry-based unit test job using pytest
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@nebay-abraha nebay-abraha requested a review from rlamacraft July 31, 2025 07:29
@rlamacraft
Copy link
Contributor

which server do the unit tests run against when they're being run by github actions?

@nebay-abraha
Copy link
Contributor Author

We are leveraging GitHub-hosted runners which are free for open source (public) repositories.

@rlamacraft
Copy link
Contributor

We are leveraging GitHub-hosted runners which are free for open source (public) repositories.

So it runs the docker version of the product?

@nebay-abraha
Copy link
Contributor Author

This workflow is currently running unit tests only, which do not require a running RSpace instance.

Our Integration tests, which are currently skipped, would require a live RSpace instance, most likely spun up from our official Docker image (rspace-os/rspace-docker). This is next on my plan.

@nebay-abraha nebay-abraha merged commit d4f9c72 into rspace-os:master Aug 6, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants