Conversation
Collaborator
|
Thanks @pitkant- greatly appreciated! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes made in a nutshell:
I noticed, while intending to cite geofi in a publication, that the citation, or more specifically the
citation("geofi")for geofi CRAN release 1.0.18 was inadvertently out of date. I changed the CITATION file so that it now automatically updates the year and version number of the package in the citation. I also removed the textVersion field since it is easily forgotten and becomes out-of-date as well. Without the textVersion field the citation() function outputs a normal text citationas I would anyway prefer it to.
Of course this is a matter of opinion so feel free to reject my PR if the old style
was more preferable.