gh-143092: Make CALL_LIST_APPEND and BINARY_OP_INPLACE_ADD_UNICODE normal instructions

[Fidget-Spinner]

Fixes #143092

These super instructions need to many special cases in the interpreter and JIT. It's best we convert them to normal instructions.

• Issue: JIT: Segfault from invalid memory read in _PyTier2Interpreter #143092

[markshannon]

The changes to _CALL_LIST_APPEND look good, but I have concerns about the handling of _BINARY_OP_ADD_UNICODE

• Because the current threshold for the JIT is quite high, the quadratic time for adding strings could still be observable in the interpreter.
• The optimizer code is quite coupled to the front-end. The optimizer code should be quite narrow in scope so that it can handle changes in other parts of the JIT.

We can make BINARY_OP_INPLACE_ADD_UNICODE a normal instruction, without much change:
Instead of writing the result string to the local and skipping the following STORE_FAST, we could write NULL to the local and leave the result string on the stack for the STORE_FAST to store. It is a bit less efficient as we need to do some extra work, but it does the two things we need: gets rid of the superinstruction and avoids quadratic behavior.

Note: Adding the extra _POP_TOP isn't that cheap, as requires an extra push, pop, decref and instruction dispatch in the interpreter. It is really cheap in the JIT though as it is effectively free. It is absolutely worth it for the simplification and improved robustness, but there is some cost.

[Fidget-Spinner]

We can make BINARY_OP_INPLACE_ADD_UNICODE a normal instruction, without much change: Instead of writing the result string to the local and skipping the following STORE_FAST, we could write NULL to the local and leave the result string on the stack for the STORE_FAST to store. It is a bit less efficient as we need to do some extra work, but it does the two things we need: gets rid of the superinstruction and avoids quadratic behavior.

This requires an oparg for both BINARY_OP (original) and STORE_FAST. How do you do this? Unless you want to pack bits into the oparg, which I'm not in favour of as we need more code to get it atomic on FT.

[Fidget-Spinner]

Wait I think I misunderstood you, let me implement this.

[Fidget-Spinner]

@markshannon I converted both of them to normal instructions. Again, I highly doubt any of them will show up on benchmarks considering how few super instructions we have, and also IIRC the original superinstructions PR only added at most 1% speedup, and that contained LOAD_FAST_LOAD_FAST and friends as well.