Skip to content

Conversation

@nirav0999
Copy link
Contributor

  • made nit changes in README

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 18, 2025 03:50
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR makes minor corrections to the README.md file, updating setup instructions and fixing a file path reference.

  • Adds PYTHONPATH export to environment setup
  • Corrects the Python script path from distill_main.py to main.py

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @nirav0999, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces minor but important corrections to the README.md file. The changes primarily focus on improving the accuracy and completeness of the setup and sampling instructions. Specifically, it adds a necessary step to configure the PYTHONPATH environment variable and corrects a script name in a command example, ensuring users can follow the documentation without encountering errors.

Highlights

  • Python Path Configuration: The setup instructions in the README now include a step to add the current working directory to the PYTHONPATH, which is crucial for Python to correctly locate modules and packages within the project.
  • Script Name Correction: The example command for sampling was updated to use the correct script name, changing distill_main.py to main.py, ensuring the instructions are accurate.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request corrects the instructions in the README file for running the data generation script. The changes are accurate, but I've provided a suggestion to further improve the commands by using Python's -m flag. This would make the instructions slightly cleaner and more robust by removing the need to manually export the PYTHONPATH.

@ganler ganler merged commit 9769575 into main Aug 24, 2025
2 checks passed
@ganler ganler deleted the test-end2end branch August 24, 2025 23:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants