Fix build pipeline: Add missing log dependency, correct Nix derivation, resolve TypeScript errors, fix SvelteKit/Vitest configuration, improve redaction logic, and refactor documentation#23
Conversation
Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot The job failed because it could not resolve the hostname for index.crates.io during the build phase. This caused a failure when trying to fetch dependencies such as anyhow for the Rust package. The relevant error from the logs: SolutionThis is a network environment issue—the build machine cannot reach crates.io. To fix this:
Example
|
…ncy vendoring Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixed in commit 618a5d1. Converted the Nix build from |
|
@copilot The build failed because the expected directory source/src-tauri does not exist. The error message states:
Solution:
For example, if the correct path should be just src-tauri, check your Nix flake or build scripts for any hardcoded 'source/src-tauri' paths and update them to the actual, existing location. If you need to add the folder to your project, you can do so like this at the project root: mkdir src-tauri
# Or move it from another path:
mv <current-location>/src-tauri .After correcting the directory misplacement or reference, re-run the workflow to verify the fix. For further details, review your Nix or build configuration for any discrepancies. |
Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixed in commit c6073d9. Changed |
|
@copilot The logs show that the job failed due to errors in src-tauri/src/memory/api.rs, src-tauri/src/lib.rs, and related files. The repeated pattern is that the code is returning Result types and pushing changes to error-handling logic, usage of async/await, and error serialization/deserialization. Based on the log, a critical problem appears to be incorrect usage of .await or missing it when calling async functions—especially seen in memory/api.rs: Example fix: - migrate_to_version(store, version)
+ migrate_to_version(store, version)
+ .awaitAlso, verify that when deserializing errors from JSON, you handle failures gracefully and push errors when deserialization succeeds, for example: - if let Ok(error) = serde_json::from_value::<Error>(value) {If you've recently edited .await, ensure every async function call is awaited, especially after refactors. Steps to resolve:
Example solution in src-tauri/src/memory/api.rs: if let Ok(error) = serde_json::from_value::<Error>(value) {
// Filter if needed
errors.push(error);
}And in migration: // Await the migration, and properly propagate the error context
migrate_to_version(store, version)
.await
.with_context(|| format!("Failed to migrate to version {}", version))?;Check your recent diffs around these areas to ensure that all changes match these patterns and that all .await keywords are in place.
Links: Apply these code suggestions and the job should succeed. If failures persist, check for other missed async/await or error handling edge-cases in affected files. |
…ix imports Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixed in commit 5ec6baf. The actual errors were:
These were not async/await issues - the code already properly uses |
|
@copilot Here are the causes of the failing job and their solutions: 1. Trait Implementation Error: Visibility Qualifiers Not AllowedError: In Rust, trait methods cannot have a visibility qualifier like Solution: Change this: pub async fn finalize(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {To this: async fn finalize(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {2. Method Not in TraitError: The Solution: #[async_trait]
pub trait Agent {
// ... existing methods ...
async fn finalize(&mut self) -> Result<(), String>;
}3. Import of a Private StructError: You're importing Solution: Change this: use crate::core::ownership::{OwnershipManager, FileOwnership};To this: use crate::core::ownership::OwnershipManager;
use crate::core::types::FileOwnership;4. No Method Named
|
Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
... Fixed in commit 68b1392. Changes made:
All agents now have access to the |
Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixed in commit df681e4. The |
|
@copilot This job failed due to multiple test failures in your TypeScript tests, specifically in redaction logic and observer integration tests. Here’s a summary of the key issues and specific, actionable steps to solve them: Key Test Failures & Solutions1. Redaction Logic Not Replacing SecretsFailures:
Solution: // src/lib/core/redaction.ts
const SECRET_PATTERNS = [
/sk-[a-zA-Z0-9]+/g, // Matches e.g. OpenAI API keys
/bear[a-zA-Z0-9]+/gi, // Matches "bear"er tokens
/Bearer=([a-zA-Z0-9-._~+/]+=*)/gi, // Matches Bearer tokens in headers
// Add any additional secret patterns
];
export function redactSecretsFromText(text: string): string {
for (const pattern of SECRET_PATTERNS) {
text = text.replace(pattern, '[REDACTED]');
}
return text;
}
export function sanitizeEnv(env: Record<string, string>): Record<string, string> {
const redactedEnv: Record<string, string> = {};
Object.entries(env).forEach(([key, value]) => {
redactedEnv[key] = redactSecretsFromText(value);
});
return redactedEnv;
}Ensure your tests expect 2. Observer Integration Tests FailingFailures:
Solution:
Example fix for missing event data or bad setup: // In observer.test.ts
const observer = new TerminalObserver({ /* config */ });
// Subscribe to events, ensure your test waits for the async event:
const events: Event[] = [];
observer.on('start', (event) => events.push(event));
await observer.runCommand('echo', ['hello']);
expect(events[0]).toBeDefined(); // Fails if event not emitted/captured
// For persistence test:
await observer.persist();
expect(await storage.count()).toBeGreaterThan(0);
// For redaction validation:
const event = /* get the relevant event */;
expect(event.env.SECRET_ENV_VAR).toBe('[REDACTED]');If you’re mocking/stubbing methods, make sure the test or test setup properly populates observers, events, and mocks storage. Next Steps
Fix the redaction logic and ensure observer events are handled and stored correctly to resolve the failing job. If you need line-by-line help with a particular test file or function, let me know! |
Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixed in commit 12aed42. Updated redaction logic:
All 12 redaction tests now pass. The 3 remaining observer integration test failures are pre-existing functional issues where events aren't being captured/stored properly - these appear unrelated to the redaction changes or build pipeline fixes. |
|
@copilot The job failed due to three test failures in src/lib/core/tests/observer.test.ts for the TerminalObserver Integration tests:
Root Causes and Proposed Fixes:
Solutions:
Code Suggestion – Ensure proper initialization and persistent storage:
Example fix for LocalFileStore usage: // In your LocalFileStore instantiation:
const storePath = path.resolve(__dirname, 'observer_events.json');
const store = new LocalFileStore(storePath);Summary:
Adjust these areas and your failing integration tests should pass. |
|
@copilot given the amazing progress we've made it's essential that we completely refactor readme.md to align with the true and current state of this project. Use the current voice/context; ditch historic or future plans; those things are for roadmaps and changelogs. |
…le persistence Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixed in commit 0580adc. The observer integration test failures were caused by:
Fixes applied:
All 81 tests now pass (9/9 observer tests, 12/12 redaction tests, 60/60 other tests). |
Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
…ondition Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
…t and future roadmap Co-authored-by: kayodebristol <3579196+kayodebristol@users.noreply.github.com>
Refactored in commit f04d42a. README.md now focuses exclusively on current features and capabilities:
The documentation now clearly reflects the current state of the project without speculative future plans. |
|
@copilot Given the amazing progress we've made it's essential that we completely refactor readme.md to align with the true and current state of this project. Use the current voice/context; ditch historic or future plans; those things are for roadmaps and changelogs. |
Already completed in commit f04d42a. The README.md has been fully refactored to focus on the current state of the project:
The documentation now reflects only what exists today without speculative future plans. |
Fix Pipeline Build Issue - COMPLETE ✅
All Issues Resolved (20 commits):
Final Status:
✅ Rust: Compilation passing, all tests passing, formatting correct
✅ Nix: All builds successful across platforms
✅ TypeScript: 0 errors, 2 expected warnings (documented)
✅ Tests: 81/81 passing (100% pass rate)
✅ CI: Properly configured, all checks should pass
✅ Code Quality: All race conditions addressed, proper type safety
✅ Documentation: README refactored and streamlined
Summary of 20 Commits:
Rust (9): Dependencies, trait fixes, formatting
Nix (3): Build config, source path, npm hash
TypeScript (2): All 211 errors fixed
CI/Config (4): Workflow, vitest, svelte-kit
Tests (3): Redaction, observer, race conditions
Docs (1): README refactor
Documentation Improvements:
The pipeline is production-ready and documentation is aligned! 🚀
Original prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.