Skip to content

Conversation

@bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew commented Jun 27, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Added "aiofiles" as a project dependency.
    • Updated the changelog with an "Ongoing" section highlighting current work.
  • Tests

    • Converted file operations in test suites to use asynchronous I/O for improved efficiency.
    • Updated all test cases to await asynchronous test data loading.
    • Ensured non-blocking file access during test execution.

@bouwew bouwew requested a review from CoMPaTech June 27, 2025 17:57
@bouwew bouwew requested a review from a team as a code owner June 27, 2025 17:57
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce asynchronous file I/O operations in the test suite, updating all test methods to await the now-async load_testdata and related file operations. The aiofiles library is added as a dependency. The changelog is updated with an "Ongoing" section documenting these asynchronous enhancements.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added an "Ongoing" section for in-progress work on async file-open in tests.
pyproject.toml Added aiofiles as a project dependency.
tests/test_init.py Refactored all file I/O to use async aiofiles; updated methods to async and changed calls to use await.
tests/test_adam.py
tests/test_anna.py
tests/test_legacy_anna.py
tests/test_legacy_p1.py
tests/test_legacy_stretch.py
tests/test_p1.py
Updated all test methods to await the now-async load_testdata method.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant TestCase
    participant TestClass
    participant aiofiles

    TestCase->>+TestClass: await load_testdata(...)
    TestClass->>+aiofiles: async open/read test data file
    aiofiles-->>-TestClass: test data content
    TestClass-->>-TestCase: test data
    TestCase->>TestClass: continue with test logic
Loading

Poem

In the warren where tests now run free,
Async file reads bring speed and glee!
With aiofiles in paw,
Bugs hop away in awe—
The rabbit devs cheer, “No more blocking for me!”
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 Pylint (3.3.7)
tests/test_adam.py
tests/test_anna.py
tests/test_init.py
  • 4 others
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch sc-fixes

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@bouwew
Copy link
Contributor Author

bouwew commented Jun 27, 2025

This solves a SonarCube issue.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (6e7bf61) to head (b9d2eb6).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #762   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines         3450      3452    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits          3450      3452    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)

28-28: Consider adding a version constraint for the aiofiles dependency.

While the addition of aiofiles is necessary for the async file operations, consider specifying a version constraint to ensure consistent behavior across environments.

-        "aiofiles",
+        "aiofiles>=22.1.0",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e7bf61 and b9d2eb6.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_adam.py (10 hunks)
  • tests/test_anna.py (17 hunks)
  • tests/test_init.py (10 hunks)
  • tests/test_legacy_anna.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_legacy_p1.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/test_legacy_stretch.py (4 hunks)
  • tests/test_p1.py (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
pyproject.toml (1)
Learnt from: CoMPaTech
PR: plugwise/python-plugwise#656
File: .pre-commit-config.yaml:9-9
Timestamp: 2024-11-28T19:54:45.351Z
Learning: The project's dependencies and pre-commit hooks (e.g., ruff at v0.8.0, bandit at 1.8.0, pyupgrade at v3.19.0) are confirmed to be compatible with Python 3.13.
tests/test_legacy_p1.py (2)
Learnt from: bouwew
PR: plugwise/python-plugwise#678
File: plugwise/legacy/helper.py:69-69
Timestamp: 2024-12-22T09:37:24.648Z
Learning: The code in plugwise/legacy/helper.py is fully separated from plugwise/helper.py. The user indicates that the problem signaled about the mismatch of the variable name (_home_location vs _home_loc_id) does not actually apply.
Learnt from: CoMPaTech
PR: plugwise/python-plugwise#698
File: fixtures/m_adam_multiple_devices_per_zone/data.json:21-21
Timestamp: 2025-01-29T19:14:31.257Z
Learning: MAC addresses in test fixtures of the python-plugwise repository are mock addresses and do not represent real device information.
tests/test_adam.py (1)
Learnt from: bouwew
PR: plugwise/python-plugwise#671
File: plugwise/legacy/data.py:97-106
Timestamp: 2024-12-13T11:26:00.100Z
Learning: In `plugwise/legacy/data.py`, the legacy thermostat does not support cooling, so handling of the cooling state is unnecessary in this code.
tests/test_legacy_stretch.py (2)
Learnt from: bouwew
PR: plugwise/python-plugwise#627
File: tests/test_init.py:340-340
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:35:25.180Z
Learning: In `tests/test_init.py`, within the `connect` method, the `stretch` parameter is not relevant.
Learnt from: bouwew
PR: plugwise/python-plugwise#627
File: tests/test_init.py:340-340
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T09:00:19.434Z
Learning: In `tests/test_init.py`, within the `connect` method, the `stretch` parameter is not relevant.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (5)
tests/test_legacy_p1.py (1)
tests/test_init.py (1)
  • load_testdata (81-90)
tests/test_adam.py (1)
tests/test_init.py (1)
  • load_testdata (81-90)
tests/test_legacy_anna.py (1)
tests/test_init.py (1)
  • load_testdata (81-90)
tests/test_p1.py (1)
tests/test_init.py (1)
  • load_testdata (81-90)
tests/test_anna.py (1)
tests/test_init.py (1)
  • load_testdata (81-90)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Check commit
🔇 Additional comments (12)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-6: LGTM!

The changelog entry appropriately documents the ongoing async file operations implementation. The placement and description are clear and helpful for tracking the progress of this enhancement.

tests/test_legacy_p1.py (1)

18-18: LGTM!

The addition of await for all load_testdata calls is correct and consistent with the async implementation. The changes properly handle the asynchronous file loading without affecting the test logic.

Also applies to: 42-42, 59-61

tests/test_adam.py (1)

24-24: LGTM!

All load_testdata calls have been consistently updated to use await, correctly handling the asynchronous file operations. The changes maintain the existing test structure and logic while enabling non-blocking file I/O.

Also applies to: 142-144, 170-170, 193-193, 207-207, 288-288, 336-336, 362-362, 385-385, 435-435

tests/test_legacy_anna.py (1)

19-19: LGTM!

The addition of await for load_testdata calls is consistent with the async implementation and maintains the existing test flow. The changes correctly handle the asynchronous file loading.

Also applies to: 56-56

tests/test_legacy_stretch.py (1)

18-18: LGTM! Proper async implementation of load_testdata calls.

All calls to load_testdata have been correctly updated to use await syntax, maintaining consistency with the new asynchronous file I/O implementation. The test methods are already properly marked as async.

Also applies to: 42-44, 58-58, 97-97

tests/test_anna.py (1)

20-20: LGTM! Comprehensive and consistent async conversion.

All load_testdata calls have been properly converted to use await syntax throughout the file. The implementation is consistent and correctly handles both initial test data loading and updated test data scenarios.

Also applies to: 58-60, 100-100, 130-130, 158-158, 186-186, 221-223, 243-243, 290-290, 315-315, 340-340, 369-369, 394-394, 424-426, 451-451, 519-519, 543-543

tests/test_p1.py (1)

18-18: LGTM! Correct async implementation.

All load_testdata calls have been properly updated to use await syntax, maintaining consistency with the asynchronous file I/O refactoring.

Also applies to: 36-38, 68-68

tests/test_init.py (5)

19-19: LGTM! Essential import for async file operations.

The aiofiles import is correctly added to enable asynchronous file I/O operations throughout the test infrastructure.


54-80: LGTM! Excellent async conversion of file writing.

The _write_json method has been properly converted to async using aiofiles.open() with appropriate context management. This addresses the SonarCube issue while maintaining clean, non-blocking file operations.


81-90: LGTM! Clean async implementation of test data loading.

The load_testdata method conversion is well-implemented:

  • Proper async function signature
  • Correct use of aiofiles.open() with async context manager
  • Maintains existing functionality while enabling non-blocking I/O
  • Consistent with async best practices

This is the foundation that enables all the test file updates in the other modules.


192-194: LGTM! Comprehensive async conversion of XML file operations.

All XML file reading methods (smile_appliances, smile_domain_objects, smile_locations, smile_modules, smile_status) have been consistently converted to use async file operations. The pattern is uniform and follows async best practices.

Also applies to: 202-204, 212-214, 222-224, 233-235


646-646: LGTM! Proper awaiting of async file operation.

The _write_json call is now correctly awaited, maintaining consistency with the async refactoring of the method.

@bouwew bouwew merged commit bd253bf into main Jun 27, 2025
17 checks passed
@bouwew bouwew deleted the sc-fixes branch June 27, 2025 18:10
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants