Continuous improvements #662
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@bouwew has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes include the addition of a new section titled "Ongoing" in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
plugwise/helper.py (2)
70-76: Enhance the docstring while the implementation looks good.The function implementation is clean and focused. Consider enhancing the docstring to include:
- Parameter descriptions
- Return value description
- Example usage
- """Helper-function for finding the relevant actuator xml-structure.""" + """Helper-function for finding the relevant actuator xml-structure. + + Args: + appliance: The XML element tree containing the appliance data + actuator: The actuator type to search for + + Returns: + The found actuator XML element or None if not found + + Example: + >>> if (search := search_actuator_functionalities( + ... appliance, "regulation_mode_control_functionality" + ... )) is not None: + ... mode = search.find("mode").text + """
Line range hint
70-720: Great code optimization through effective refactoring!The introduction of
search_actuator_functionalitiesand its consistent usage across methods has successfully:
- Reduced code duplication in XML searching logic
- Improved maintainability by centralizing the search functionality
- Preserved existing behavior while making the code more modular
This aligns well with the PR's code optimization objective.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)plugwise/helper.py(6 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- CHANGELOG.md
🔇 Additional comments (3)
plugwise/helper.py (3)
461-472: LGTM! Clean refactoring using the new helper function.
The method has been effectively refactored to use the new search_actuator_functionalities helper, making the code more maintainable while preserving the special case handling for cooling mode.
701-703: LGTM! Good use of the new helper function.
The method has been cleanly refactored to use search_actuator_functionalities while maintaining the existing cooling mode logic.
718-720: LGTM! Consistent refactoring pattern.
The method follows the same clean refactoring pattern using search_actuator_functionalities.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #662 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 3439 3435 -4
=========================================
- Hits 3439 3435 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
bouwew
force-pushed
the
improve-actuator
branch
from
159aad9 to
a648c73
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
plugwise/helper.py (1)
71-77: LGTM! Consider adding parameter type documentation.The new helper function effectively centralizes the XML search logic. The implementation is clean and handles the not-found case appropriately.
Consider enhancing the docstring with parameter types:
- """Helper-function for finding the relevant actuator xml-structure.""" + """Helper-function for finding the relevant actuator xml-structure. + + Args: + appliance: The XML element tree containing the appliance data + actuator: The actuator type to search for + + Returns: + The found actuator XML element or None if not found + """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)plugwise/helper.py(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- CHANGELOG.md
🔇 Additional comments (4)
plugwise/helper.py (4)
468-483: LGTM! Good refactoring to reduce code duplication.
The method has been effectively refactored to use the new helper function while maintaining its core functionality. The code is more maintainable now.
705-719: LGTM! Well-structured helper method.
The new helper method effectively encapsulates the common functionality for retrieving gateway modes. Good validation and error handling.
727-734: LGTM! Consistent refactoring pattern.
The methods have been effectively simplified by leveraging the new helper function. The changes maintain the existing functionality while improving code maintainability.
Also applies to: 743-749
71-77: Verify test coverage for the refactored code.
The refactoring looks good overall. Let's ensure the new and modified methods are properly covered by tests.
Also applies to: 468-483, 705-719
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
plugwise/helper.py (3)
71-77: Enhance the docstring with parameter and return type descriptions.The function implementation is clean and follows good practices. Consider improving the docstring:
- """Helper-function for finding the relevant actuator xml-structure.""" + """Helper-function for finding the relevant actuator xml-structure. + + Args: + appliance (etree): The appliance XML element to search in + actuator (str): The actuator type to search for + + Returns: + etree | None: The found actuator XML element or None if not found + """
468-482: Consider separating the cooling detection logic.The function has a hidden side effect of setting
self._cooling_present. Consider:
- Making this side effect explicit in the docstring
- Or better, separating the cooling detection into its own function
- """Helper-function for _appliance_info_finder().""" + """Helper-function for _appliance_info_finder() to get allowed actuator modes. + + Note: Sets self._cooling_present to True if 'cooling' mode is found. + + Args: + appliance (etree): The appliance XML element + actuator_type (str): The type of actuator to search for + + Returns: + list[str]: List of allowed modes for the actuator + """Alternative refactor to separate concerns:
def _get_appl_actuator_modes( self, appliance: etree, actuator_type: str ) -> list[str]: - """Helper-function for _appliance_info_finder().""" + """Get allowed modes for the given actuator type.""" mode_list: list[str] = [] if ( search := search_actuator_functionalities(appliance, actuator_type) ) is not None and (modes := search.find("allowed_modes")) is not None: for mode in modes: mode_list.append(mode.text) - # Collect cooling_present state from the available regulation_modes - if mode.text == "cooling": - self._cooling_present = True + self._check_cooling_mode(mode.text) return mode_list + def _check_cooling_mode(self, mode: str) -> None: + """Check if cooling mode is present and update state.""" + if mode == "cooling": + self._cooling_present = True
704-718: Enhance the docstring with parameter descriptions and validation details.The function implementation is clean but the docstring could be more informative:
- """Helper-function for _get_regulation_mode and _get_gateway_mode. - - Collect the requested gateway mode. - """ + """Helper-function for _get_regulation_mode and _get_gateway_mode. + + Collect the requested gateway mode. Only works for ADAM smile type + and when entity_id matches the gateway_id. + + Args: + appliance (etree): The appliance XML element + entity_id (str): The entity ID to validate + key (str): The actuator functionality key to search for + + Returns: + str | None: The mode if found and validation passes, None otherwise + """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
plugwise/helper.py(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
plugwise/helper.py (1)
410-412: LGTM! Good refactoring for improved modularity.
The changes effectively utilize the new helper functions, reducing code duplication and improving maintainability. The implementation is consistent across all modified methods.
Also applies to: 455-457, 726-733, 742-748
bouwew
force-pushed
the
improve-actuator
branch
from
256b9a0 to
d64b02e
Compare
|
Summary by CodeRabbit