Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @erohinaelena, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses an unstable loading issue by performing a comprehensive update of project dependencies and implementing a mechanism to stabilize the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix an unstable loading issue by changing how the pFrame output is handled. The model was updated to use output() instead of outputWithStatus(), and caching logic was added to the UI to prevent flickering. While the caching approach is sound for improving UI stability, the implementation has a significant drawback: it hardcodes a success status (ok: true), which can hide computation errors from the user and lead to stale data being displayed without any warning. My review includes suggestions to address this by either reverting the model change and handling the status flags from outputWithStatus correctly, or finding an alternative way to track the computation status. I've also included a minor suggestion for code cleanup.
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| .outputWithStatus('pFrame', (ctx) => { | ||
| .output('pFrame', (ctx) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changing from outputWithStatus to output seems to be the root cause for the complex caching logic and potential error-hiding in GraphPage.vue. While this might fix the 'unstable loading', it loses the error and stability status that outputWithStatus provides.
Have you considered keeping outputWithStatus and instead adjusting the UI to correctly handle the stable and ok flags from the OutputWithStatus object? This would likely be a more robust solution that doesn't hide computation errors from the user.
| const graphMakerPframe = computed(() => { | ||
| return {ok: true, value: cachedPFrame.value, stable: cachedPFrame.value !== undefined} as OutputWithStatus<PFrameHandle>; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoding ok: true here can hide errors from the user. If the pFrame computation fails, app.model.outputs.pFrame will likely be undefined. Your caching logic will then cause the UI to show stale data, but since ok is true, no error will be indicated. This can be very misleading.
If the change in model/src/index.ts to use output() is to be kept, you need a way to determine the actual status of the computation to set ok correctly. Without a proper status, the UI might appear to be working correctly when it's actually broken.
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const cachedPFrame = ref<PFrameHandle | undefined>(app.model.outputs.pFrame); | ||
| watch(() => app.model.outputs.pFrame, async (handle) => { |
No description provided.