Open
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request finalizes the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Test Results
Benchmark Summary (Judy vs PHP Array)Ratio = Judy / Array. Bold = Judy wins (≤0.95x). Plain = Array is faster/smaller. Time (Write / Read) — Linux
Memory — Linux
Time (Write / Read) — Windows
Memory — Windows
Raw benchmark dataWrite Time — Linux
Read Time — Linux
Memory — Linux
Write Time — Windows
Read Time — Windows
Memory — Windows
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request bumps the version to 2.4.0 in package.xml, php_judy.h, and updates the corresponding test expectations. The release notes in package.xml are also updated to reflect the features and improvements for version 2.4.0. The changes are correct and consistent. While reviewing package.xml, I noticed that many <file> entries are missing the md5sum attribute. Although this is outside the direct changes in this PR, it would be beneficial to add these checksums in a follow-up to ensure package integrity for PECL.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
PHP_JUDY_VERSIONfrom2.3.0to2.4.0inphp_judy.hpackage.xmlversion and release notes for 2.4.0tests/001.phptAll four phases of the performance overhaul and feature extensions (issue #37) are now complete:
slice($start, $end)__serialize/__unserializeTest plan