Skip to content

WIP: [rphillips] spoof vendor of https://github.com/coreos/go-systemd/pull/496 #2558

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
rphillips wants to merge 7 commits into
base: release-4.21
Choose a base branch
from
Open

WIP: [rphillips] spoof vendor of https://github.com/coreos/go-systemd/pull/496 #2558

rphillips wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

@rphillips
Copy link

@rphillips rphillips commented Jan 10, 2026

No description provided.

jupierce and others added 7 commits October 27, 2025 09:35
@jupierce
UPSTREAM: <carry>: Extend k8s suite timeouts for parallel testing load
59a2d7e 
Analysis of flakes from the k8s suite has shown consistent examples
of otherwise well behaved testing failing due timeouts because of
temporary load on controllers during parallel testing. Increasing these
timeouts will reduce flakes.
@tkashem
UPSTREAM: <carry>: enable InPlace resize test
c8f6737
@openshift-merge-bot
Merge pull request kubernetes#2497 from jupierce/flake_reduction
fc8194c 
NO-ISSUE: Extend k8s suite timeouts for parallel testing load
@openshift-merge-bot
Merge pull request kubernetes#2532 from tkashem/enable-test
76cb1db 
OCPBUGS-63045: enable InPlace resize test
@ingvagabund
OCPBUGS-61515: UPSTREAM: 135372: Re-enable temporarily disabled Sched…
581cfc7 
…ulerPreemption test (kubernetes#2524)

* UPSTREAM: 135372: fix(SchedulerPreemption/Async): schedule all medium priority pods first so all low priority pods can be preempted

* UPSTREAM: 135372: fix(SchedulerPreemption/Async): schedule all medium priority pods first so all low priority pods can be preempted
@haircommander
WIP: spoof vendor of coreos/go-systemd#496
14f3a2f 
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
@rphillips
test some improvements
bac299e
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Jan 10, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 10, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 10, 2026

@rphillips: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jan 10, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rphillips
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jerpeter1 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rphillips
Copy link
Author

rphillips commented Jan 10, 2026

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.22-ocp-e2e-upgrade-aws-ovn-multi-a-a 15

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2026

@rphillips: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.22-ocp-e2e-upgrade-aws-ovn-multi-a-a

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/bab10560-ee16-11f0-847a-5a646f77927b-0

@rphillips rphillips changed the base branch from master to release-4.22 January 10, 2026 14:16
@rphillips rphillips changed the base branch from release-4.22 to release-4.21 January 10, 2026 14:17
@rphillips
Copy link
Author

rphillips commented Jan 10, 2026

/payload periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.21-ocp-e2e-upgrade-aws-ovn-multi-a-a 5

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2026

@rphillips: it appears that you have attempted to use some version of the payload command, but your comment was incorrectly formatted and cannot be acted upon. See the docs for usage info.

@rphillips
Copy link
Author

rphillips commented Jan 10, 2026

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.21-ocp-e2e-upgrade-aws-ovn-multi-a-a 5

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2026

@rphillips: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.21-ocp-e2e-upgrade-aws-ovn-multi-a-a

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/68b6cf10-ee2f-11f0-9fad-404542db2ef3-0

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2026

@rphillips: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify bac299e link true /test verify
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips bac299e link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
ci/prow/verify bac299e link true /test verify
ci/prow/e2e-aws-crun-wasm bac299e link true /test e2e-aws-crun-wasm
ci/prow/verify bac299e link true /test verify
ci/prow/verify-commits bac299e link true /test verify-commits
ci/prow/verify-commits bac299e link true /test verify-commits

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bertinatto bertinatto Awaiting requested review from bertinatto

@jerpeter1 jerpeter1 Awaiting requested review from jerpeter1

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@rphillips @openshift-ci-robot @jupierce @tkashem @ingvagabund @haircommander