8347911: Limit the length of inflated text chunks

[TimPushkin]

Backport of JDK-8347911 for parity with Oracle's JDK 8u461.

Conflicts:

• Copyright years
• Missing JDK-8139206: use IOUtils.readNBytes(...) instead of the missing InputStream.readNBytes(...)

Testing: GitHub CI, jdk_imageio test group locally (headless linux/arm64)

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8347911 needs maintainer approval

Integration blocker

 ⚠️ Dependency #686 must be integrated first

Issue

• JDK-8347911: Limit the length of inflated text chunks (Bug - P3)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/687/head:pull/687
$ git checkout pull/687

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/687
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/687/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 687

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 687

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/687.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back tpushkin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/686 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 02: Full (83fa86fc)
• 01: Full - Incremental (ab0f8cd2)
• 00: Full (ab0f8cd2)

[TimPushkin]

I believe the test failures are not related

[bridgekeeper]

@TimPushkin This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

[TimPushkin]

/touch

[openjdk]

@TimPushkin The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

[bridgekeeper]

@TimPushkin This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

[TimPushkin]

/touch

[openjdk]

@TimPushkin The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

[bridgekeeper]

@TimPushkin This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

[TimPushkin]

/touch

[openjdk]

@TimPushkin The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

[bridgekeeper]

@TimPushkin This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

[TimPushkin]

/touch

[openjdk]

@TimPushkin The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

[openjdk]

@TimPushkin this pull request can not be integrated into pr/686 due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout 8347911-jdk8
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pr/686
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge pr/686"
git push

[openjdk]

@TimPushkin Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

[TimPushkin]

Rebased on top of the current master.

The CI failure is a single unrelated GC test, already reported as JDK-8303159.