Skip to content

Conversation

@rvansa
Copy link
Collaborator

@rvansa rvansa commented Nov 28, 2025

Historically we have an extensive set of tests for java.nio.channels.Selector. However this runs only on Linux (using CRIU) rather than being platform agnostic and tested on all platforms. On Linux, it does not exercise PollSelectorImpl (this can be preferred using a system property) either - just the default EpollSelectorImpl.

This PR enables testing on all available Selector implementations, cleans up the implementation of those tests and introduces the C/R implementations.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace

Issue

  • JDK-8371549: [CRaC] Implement C/R in Selector on non-Linux (Task - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/crac.git pull/276/head:pull/276
$ git checkout pull/276

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/276
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/crac.git pull/276/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 276

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 276

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/crac/pull/276.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 28, 2025

👋 Welcome back rvansa! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into crac will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 28, 2025

@rvansa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8371549: [CRaC] Implement C/R in Selector on non-Linux

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the crac branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the crac branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 28, 2025
@rvansa rvansa requested a review from TimPushkin November 28, 2025 15:54
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Webrevs

@TimPushkin
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry, the change is big and I haven't had enough spare time to review it recently. Hopefully will get to it in upcoming weeks, if nobody else will. I believe this is not a priority and does not block anything?

@rvansa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rvansa commented Dec 22, 2025

@TimPushkin I think we had it pop somewhere but it's not a high priority. Ideally if you can review in early January.

Copy link
Collaborator

@TimPushkin TimPushkin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't read through SelectorCRaCSupport very carefully since it's mainly pre-existing code

* @test id=ALT_LINUX
* @library /test/lib
* @modules java.base/jdk.internal.crac:+open
* @requires (os.family == "linux")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't tested this but PollSelectorProvider is in unix directory so it should be available on other POSIX platforms. So maybe os.family != "windows"?

@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
package sun.nio.ch;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing license header


@Override
protected Collection<FileDescriptor> claimFileDescriptors() {
// What about WEPoll eph?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this become a TODO/FIXME

Comment on lines +88 to +89
// On Windows the native FDs check is a no-op, but we need to set
// the FD to prevent assertion failure on Descriptor.getFd()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe allow -1 as a value? Having 0 may be confusing as it is a valid FD value.

In the future, it looks like we need a more general abstraction for FD/handle.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants