fs: glob is stable, so should not emit experimental warnings

[theoludwig]

In #57513 fs.glob was marked as stable, but that was only in the documentation, so if it's considered stable, it should not emit experimental warnings.

[theoludwig]

cc @jasnell

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/66713/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (e38ce27) to head (2a9f442).
Report is 270 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #58236      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.14%   90.12%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         629      629              
  Lines      186634   186626       -8     
  Branches    36616    36624       +8     
==========================================
- Hits       168236   168203      -33     
- Misses      11204    11217      +13     
- Partials     7194     7206      +12     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
lib/fs.js	98.26% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
lib/internal/fs/promises.js	98.23% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
lib/path.js	96.02% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️

... and 39 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/66737/

[nodejs-github-bot]

Landed in 6710c00