Skip to content

Conversation

@hvgazula
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@hvgazula hvgazula requested a review from gaiborjosue November 15, 2023 22:27
@hvgazula hvgazula marked this pull request as draft November 16, 2023 01:28
@gaiborjosue gaiborjosue marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2023 22:37
@gaiborjosue gaiborjosue marked this pull request as draft November 17, 2023 22:38
Copy link
Contributor

@gaiborjosue gaiborjosue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything else seems good to me. The only other thing is #108 but I will do that in the branch or do you want to do that post-merge?

@hvgazula hvgazula marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2024 16:14
@hvgazula hvgazula self-assigned this Feb 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hvgazula hvgazula left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

spec.yaml is not updated correctly improve workflow to perform all operations on self-hosted runner

3 participants