Skip to content

Conversation

@dadamsncsa
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dadamsncsa dadamsncsa changed the title Review PR for GSA-Image Tool 2.0.0 GSA-Image Tool 2.0.0 Nov 12, 2020
@dadamsncsa dadamsncsa marked this pull request as draft November 20, 2020 16:04
@dadamsncsa
Copy link
Member Author

@AagamShah97 @mitishasurana, I have open this PR with a draft of the upcoming 2.0.0 release we discussed with database features. The document draft for this SPD is in nanomfg/community in the gsaimage-2.0.0-planning-1 branch. The current area of focus should be 3.1 and 3.2. Careful attention to user requirements here will help us make sure we are able to implement all of the intended features.
W/r to 3.1 user classes, I think it would be useful more carefully define the user classes in terms of how they interact wit hthe system. the "community user" is a bit ambiguous. Some ideas:
users who upload individual SEM images with graphene
users who load images from the database, other interactions?

Also the "nanomfg user" class is a bit confusing. nanoHub user would make more sense, but techicaly all of our user access vai nanoHub, now...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants