[bugfix] Fix args template type#8005
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily addresses a bug related to retrieving template information by correcting the attribute accessed. It also includes a dependency update to relax the version constraint for the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses a bug by correcting the attribute name from template_type to template for argument parsing, and also refactors some imports for better code organization. A notable change is the removal of the upper version limit for the transformers dependency. While this provides flexibility, it can introduce instability from future breaking changes. I've added a comment suggesting to re-introduce an upper bound to ensure long-term stability.
| tiktoken | ||
| tqdm | ||
| transformers>=4.33,<4.58 | ||
| transformers>=4.33 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removing the upper version constraint for transformers can introduce instability if future releases include breaking changes. It's a best practice to pin dependencies with an upper bound to ensure reproducibility and prevent unexpected failures. Please consider adding an upper bound, for instance, <5.0 or based on the latest version you've tested against.
transformers>=4.33,<5.0
No description provided.