Skip to content

Conversation

@koic
Copy link
Member

@koic koic commented Dec 20, 2025

Motivation and Context

This PR adds support for the optional description parameter in serverInfo. This parameter has been supported since the 2025-11-25 MCP specification. https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-11-25/schema#implementation

How Has This Been Tested?

The tests have been updated and are now passing.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

@koic
Copy link
Member Author

koic commented Dec 20, 2025

To get this CI passing, #184 needs to be merged and this branch needs to be rebased.

atesgoral
atesgoral previously approved these changes Dec 20, 2025
@koic
Copy link
Member Author

koic commented Dec 20, 2025

@atesgoral To move this PR forward, #184 and #190 need to be merged first. Could you review them? Also, they will likely conflict, so #190 should be reviewed first.

This PR adds support for the optional `description` parameter in `serverInfo`.
This parameter has been supported since the 2025-11-25 MCP specification.
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-11-25/schema#implementation
@koic koic force-pushed the add_description_to_server_info branch from f923e49 to 851974e Compare December 20, 2025 10:13
@koic
Copy link
Member Author

koic commented Dec 20, 2025

@atesgoral I’ve resolved the conflicts. Could you take another look?

@koic koic merged commit 171baa8 into modelcontextprotocol:main Dec 20, 2025
6 checks passed
@koic koic deleted the add_description_to_server_info branch December 20, 2025 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants