-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
SVM competing risks #98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Raphael Sonabend <raphaelsonabend@gmail.com>
adibender
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some minor stuff only
book/P3C15_svm.qmd
Outdated
| This chapter starts with SVMs in the regression setting before moving to adaptions for survival analysis. | ||
|
|
||
| As of the time of publication, no SSVMs for competing risks appear to have been published [@Kantidakis2023; @Monterrubio-Gómez2024; @Djangang2025]. | ||
| Theoretically, one could use any of the methods to estimate per-cause risk by considering each risk separately and censoring observations that experience a different risk, however this has not been validated in the literature. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the important part in the caus-specific paradigm is that the learner returns a hazard estimate. If thats the case, you can calculate the CIF. If it only returns the surv prob, one could try to approximate a hazard estimate from S(t) (e.g. via numeric differentiation and some assumptions), but it's less common. not sure if SVM provides hazard estimates
Signed-off-by: Raphael Sonabend <raphaelsonabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Sonabend <raphaelsonabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Sonabend <raphaelsonabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Sonabend <raphaelsonabend@gmail.com>
No description provided.