Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Good work on the test suite for the splitInteger function. You've covered most of the required scenarios well. However, changes are needed because one of the examples from the task description is missing a corresponding test. Please add a test case for splitInteger(32, 6) to verify that it correctly returns [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6]. Ensuring all specified examples are tested is crucial for meeting the project requirements.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { | ||
|
|
||
| expect(splitInteger(2, 3)).toEqual([0, 1, 1]); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's great that you've added a test case for when value < numberOfParts. However, the test for the example splitInteger(32, 6) from the task description is missing. Please add this test case to ensure all requirements are met.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work addressing the previous feedback! Your solution now meets all the requirements, and I'm happy to approve it. You've successfully added the test case for splitInteger(32, 6).
As a small suggestion for the future, it's a good practice to give each test a unique description. In src/splitInteger.test.js, two tests share the same name. Making them unique, for instance by including the input values, helps make test reports clearer and debugging easier. This is just a best practice tip and doesn't affect this approval.
Great job completing the task!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| expect(splitInteger(17, 4)).toEqual([4, 4, 4, 5]); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should sort parts ascending if they are not equal', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test has the same description as the one on line 15. It's a good practice to give each test a unique and descriptive name to make test reports clearer and debugging easier. For example, you could include the input values in the description, like test('should split 32 into 6 parts correctly', () => { ... });.
2 participants
No description provided.