Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
I am requesting changes because one explicit requirement from the task description is still missing from your tests, which counts as a critical blocker for completion. Your implementation of splitInteger looks correct and your existing Jest tests cover length, sum, sorting, and max–min difference for several scenarios, which is great. However, the description explicitly calls out the example splitInteger(32, 6) === [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6], and the review comment requires that you add a direct assertion for it.
To fix this, open src/splitInteger.test.js and, after your existing tests, add a new Jest test such as:
it('splits 32 into 6 parts exactly as in the example', () => {
expect(splitInteger(32, 6)).toEqual([5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6]);
});This will ensure the documented example is explicitly validated and satisfy the review comment and checklist requirement. Once that test is added and passing, your solution will fully meet the task requirements—nice job on the rest of the implementation and tests so far.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
| expect(result.reduce((s, x) => s + x, 0)).toBe(17); | ||
| expect(result).toEqual([...result].sort((a, b) => a - b)); | ||
| expect(Math.max(...result) - Math.min(...result)).toBeLessThanOrEqual(1); | ||
| // expect(result).toEqual([4, 4, 4, 5]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description includes the example splitInteger(32, 6) === [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6] which is not covered by your tests. Add an explicit Jest assertion such as expect(splitInteger(32, 6)).toEqual([5,5,5,5,6,6]); (place it after the existing tests). This is required to satisfy the example in the task description.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
I am approving your solution because it fully meets the functional requirements and your tests clearly verify the key behaviors. Your splitInteger implementation correctly returns the requested number of integer parts, keeps them in non-decreasing order, and guarantees that the difference between the largest and smallest element is at most 1, including cases where the value is less than the number of parts. The Jest test suite checks length, sum, ordering, and max–min difference, and also includes direct assertions for the specified examples like splitInteger(8, 1), splitInteger(6, 2), and splitInteger(32, 6).
As small, non-blocking improvements, you could remove the commented-out assertion around the splitInteger(17, 4) test to keep the tests tidy, and optionally add an assertion that all elements are integers (e.g., result.every(Number.isInteger)) for extra clarity. If you want to extend coverage further, consider adding a couple of edge-case tests with larger numbers or boundary inputs. Overall, this is a clean, correct solution with a solid set of tests—well done.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.