Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job on the implementation of the splitInteger function! The logic is clean, correct, and handles the requirements well.
However, I am requesting a small change to your tests. The test suite is missing a case for one of the examples provided in the task description. To ensure full compliance with the requirements, please add a test case for splitInteger(32, 6) to src/splitInteger.test.js.
Once that test is added, your solution will be ready to go!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
|
|
||
| test("should add zeros if value < numberOfParts", () => { | ||
| expect(splitInteger(3, 5)).toEqual([0, 0, 1, 1, 1]); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's great that you've covered the main examples. To make the test suite more complete, please also add a test case for splitInteger(32, 6), which is mentioned in the task description.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work on this submission! I am approving your solution as you've successfully added the missing test case for splitInteger(32, 6), and the test suite now fully covers all requirements. Please disregard the failing build (12.x) check. This is caused by an issue with the project's build environment using an outdated Node.js version and is not a fault in your code. No action is required from you to fix it. Great job completing the task!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.