Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job getting the test file set up! The tests you've written are a solid start. However, changes are needed because a couple of the specific test cases required by the task description are missing or incorrect in src/splitInteger.test.js.
Specifically:
- The test for a single part should be for
splitInteger(8, 1), butsplitInteger(6, 1)was used instead. - The required test case for
splitInteger(32, 6)is missing from the test suite.
Please add the missing test and update the incorrect one to match the requirements exactly. Once that's done, this will be good to go!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work on this iteration! I am approving your solution as you've successfully addressed all the previous feedback, and your test suite now correctly covers all required scenarios. Please don't worry about the failing build (12.x) check; it's due to an outdated Node.js version in the project's CI environment and is not an issue with your code. I have one minor suggestion for future improvement: the test description should add zeros if value < numberOfParts in src/splitInteger.test.js could be more precise, for example: should correctly split the number when value is less than numberOfParts. This is just a small tip for clarity, not a required change. Great job, and keep up the fantastic work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| expect(result).toEqual([4, 4, 4, 5]); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a great test case to add for coverage! However, the description is a bit misleading. The function's main goal is to split the number, and the zeros are just a result of that when value < numberOfParts. A more accurate description might be something like should correctly split the number when value is less than numberOfParts.
2 participants
No description provided.