Skip to content

Conversation

@VladimirTaytor
Copy link
Contributor

@VladimirTaytor VladimirTaytor commented Dec 4, 2025

Motivation

We want to release new version

Changes

  • Bump version

How to test

  • n/a

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Enhanced and fixed README documentation.
  • Chores

    • Bumped project version to 2.4.0.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Walkthrough

A release PR that documents version 2.4.0 changes in the CHANGELOG and updates the version field in pyproject.toml from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0. No functional code modifications are introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Version Release Documentation
CHANGELOG.md
Added new [2.4.0] release section with four entries documenting README and readme-related fixes and enhancements
Project Configuration
pyproject.toml
Bumped project version from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0 in the [project] table

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • Bump version to 2.2.0 #46 — Similar release PR pattern: adds new CHANGELOG release section and bumps project version in pyproject.toml

Suggested reviewers

  • Ihor-Bilous
  • IgorDobryn
  • yanchuk

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, hooray! The version grows today,
Two point four awaits in changelogs at play,
From readme fixes to the notes we write,
The release marches on, polished and bright!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Release v2.4.0' clearly and concisely summarizes the main change—a version release to 2.4.0, which aligns directly with the version bump in pyproject.toml and CHANGELOG.md updates.
Description check ✅ Passed The description covers the template's key sections (Motivation, Changes, How to test) but lacks detail; motivation is vague ('release new version'), changes only mention 'Bump version' without specifics, and 'Images and GIFs' section is omitted.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch release-v2.4.0

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@VladimirTaytor VladimirTaytor marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 17:06
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 858e834 and 1800d47.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
CHANGELOG.md

2-2: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


3-3: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


4-4: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


5-5: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)

3-3: Version bump looks good.

The version has been correctly updated from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0 in proper semantic versioning format.

@yanchuk yanchuk merged commit 8821498 into main Dec 5, 2025
16 checks passed
@yanchuk yanchuk deleted the release-v2.4.0 branch December 5, 2025 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants