Add standardized CI/CD workflows and repository hygiene files#12
Add standardized CI/CD workflows and repository hygiene files#12
Conversation
- Add lint-test.yml workflow for Python and Node/TypeScript - Add deploy.yml workflow with environment matrix and OIDC placeholders - Add codeql.yml for security scanning - Add dependency-review.yml for PR dependency review - Add SECURITY.md with vulnerability reporting and SLA - Add CONTRIBUTING.md with development guidelines - Add CODEOWNERS with @lippytm as fallback - Add MIT LICENSE - Add issue and PR templates - Update README with CI status badges Co-authored-by: lippytm <65956507+lippytm@users.noreply.github.com>
Replace placeholder email with clear instructions to use GitHub's security advisory reporting or contact maintainer directly Co-authored-by: lippytm <65956507+lippytm@users.noreply.github.com>
Remove complex matrix strategy from single-environment deploy job and use inputs.environment directly for cleaner, more maintainable code Co-authored-by: lippytm <65956507+lippytm@users.noreply.github.com>
- Fix hashFiles condition to properly check for null - Improve npm script detection using npm run instead of grep - Replace hardcoded false with repository variable for multi-env deploy Co-authored-by: lippytm <65956507+lippytm@users.noreply.github.com>
- Use npm --if-present for cleaner optional script execution - Ensure hashFiles condition properly checks for empty string - Update dates to month-year format for clarity Co-authored-by: lippytm <65956507+lippytm@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request adds comprehensive CI/CD workflows and repository hygiene files to improve development practices, security, and collaboration. The implementation provides standardized GitHub Actions for linting, testing, deployment, and security scanning, along with detailed documentation for contributors and security policies.
Changes:
- Added four GitHub Actions workflows: lint-test.yml for code quality checks, deploy.yml for multi-environment deployments with OIDC placeholders, codeql.yml for security analysis, and dependency-review.yml for vulnerability scanning
- Introduced comprehensive repository documentation including SECURITY.md with vulnerability reporting procedures, CONTRIBUTING.md with development guidelines, CODEOWNERS for code review assignments, MIT LICENSE, and structured issue/PR templates
- Enhanced README.md with CI/CD status badges for workflow monitoring
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 11 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| .github/workflows/lint-test.yml | Implements Python (ruff/pytest) and Node/TypeScript (ESLint/tests/build) linting and testing with matrix strategy for frontend and contracts |
| .github/workflows/deploy.yml | Provides multi-environment deployment workflow with OIDC authentication placeholders, environment-specific variables, and documented required secrets |
| .github/workflows/codeql.yml | Configures CodeQL security scanning for JavaScript/TypeScript and Python with scheduled weekly scans |
| .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml | Enables dependency review on pull requests with moderate+ severity failure threshold |
| SECURITY.md | Establishes security policy with vulnerability reporting procedures, SLAs, branch protection requirements, and required secrets documentation |
| CONTRIBUTING.md | Provides comprehensive contribution guidelines including development setup, coding standards for Python/TypeScript/Solidity, testing requirements, and commit message conventions |
| CODEOWNERS | Defines code ownership with @lippytm as fallback owner for all paths and specific ownership for backend, frontend, contracts, and CI/CD directories |
| LICENSE | Adds MIT License with 2026 copyright |
| .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md | Creates structured PR template with comprehensive checklists for code quality, testing, security, and component-specific requirements |
| .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md | Provides structured issue template for bug reports and feature requests with environment information fields |
| README.md | Adds CI/CD workflow status badges and MIT license badge |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| - [ ] My branch is up to date with the base branch | ||
| - [ ] I have resolved any merge conflicts | ||
| - [ ] Commit messages follow the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) specification | ||
| - [ ] I have read the [Contributing Guidelines](../CONTRIBUTING.md) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The link path "../CONTRIBUTING.md" may not work correctly from the PR template location. PR templates in .github/ should use root-relative paths. Consider changing this to either "/CONTRIBUTING.md" or "../../CONTRIBUTING.md" to ensure the link works correctly when viewing pull requests on GitHub.
| - [ ] I have read the [Contributing Guidelines](../CONTRIBUTING.md) | |
| - [ ] I have read the [Contributing Guidelines](/CONTRIBUTING.md) |
| - [ ] I have searched existing issues to avoid duplicates | ||
| - [ ] I have provided all relevant information | ||
| - [ ] I have added appropriate labels (if I have permission) | ||
| - [ ] I have read the [Contributing Guidelines](../CONTRIBUTING.md) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The link path "../CONTRIBUTING.md" may not work correctly from the issue template location. Issue templates in .github/ should use root-relative paths. Consider changing this to either "/CONTRIBUTING.md" or "../../CONTRIBUTING.md" to ensure the link works correctly when viewing issues on GitHub.
| - [ ] I have read the [Contributing Guidelines](../CONTRIBUTING.md) | |
| - [ ] I have read the [Contributing Guidelines](/CONTRIBUTING.md) |
| - name: Deploy to ${{ matrix.environment }} | ||
| run: | | ||
| echo "Deploying to ${{ matrix.environment }}" | ||
| # Reuse deployment steps from above |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The deploy-matrix job only contains a placeholder echo statement without actual deployment logic. The comment on line 176 mentions "Reuse deployment steps from above" but there's no implementation. Consider either implementing the actual deployment steps for this multi-environment deployment job or documenting that this is intentionally left as a stub for future implementation.
| # Reuse deployment steps from above | |
| # NOTE: This step is intentionally left as a placeholder for multi-environment deployments. | |
| # When enabling this job, copy the appropriate deployment steps from the 'deploy' job above | |
| # (e.g., build, package, and deploy commands) so that each matrix environment is deployed. |
Implements standardized GitHub Actions workflows for linting, testing, deployment, and security scanning, along with comprehensive repository documentation for security, contribution guidelines, and issue/PR management.
Workflows
lint-test.yml
hashFiles('backend/requirements.txt')npm --if-presentfor optional scriptsdeploy.yml
WEB3_RPC_URL,OPENAI_API_KEY,SLACK_BOT_TOKEN,DISCORD_BOT_TOKEN,DB_URL,S3_BUCKETENABLE_MULTI_ENV_DEPLOYrepository variablecontents: read,id-token: writefor OIDCcodeql.yml
security-events: writedependency-review.yml
Repository Files
SECURITY.md
CONTRIBUTING.md
CODEOWNERS
@lippytmfallback for all paths/backend/,/frontend/,/contracts/,/.github/LICENSE
Issue/PR Templates
README.md
Notes
${{ secrets.* }}syntaxci-cd.ymlpreserved for backward compatibilityOriginal prompt
This pull request was created from Copilot chat.
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.