-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
LCORE-1071: docstrings for config unit tests (final version) #965
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LCORE-1071: docstrings for config unit tests (final version) #965
Conversation
WalkthroughExpanded and clarified docstrings in unit tests for multiple configuration models; no functional logic, assertions, control flow, or exported interfaces were changed. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @tests/unit/models/config/test_conversation_history.py:
- Around line 248-254: The test's docstring is a copy-paste leftover mentioning
"SQLite conversation cache configuration" while the test actually validates
PostgreSQL configuration (it uses CACHE_TYPE_POSTGRES and
PostgreSQLDatabaseConfiguration); update the docstring to accurately describe
that the test verifies PostgreSQL conversation cache configuration and expects a
ValidationError for missing required fields (e.g., "Field required").
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py (1)
128-141: Consider removing the "Raises" section from test docstring.The docstring includes a "Raises:" section, which is typically used for production code that raises exceptions to its callers. Since this is a test function that expects an exception (via
pytest.raises), the "Raises" section is unconventional. The existing description before the Raises section already clearly documents the expected behavior.📝 Suggested simplification
"""Check the JwtRoleRule config class. Ensure creating a JwtRoleRule with an invalid regex pattern for the MATCH operator raises a ValidationError. Attempts to construct JwtRoleRule with operator set to JsonPathOperator.MATCH and a malformed regex value; the constructor must raise a ValidationError with message "Invalid regex pattern for MATCH operator". - - Raises: - ValidationError: if the provided regex pattern for MATCH is invalid - (message contains "Invalid regex pattern for MATCH operator"). """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
tests/unit/models/config/test_authentication_configuration.pytests/unit/models/config/test_conversation_history.pytests/unit/models/config/test_dump_configuration.pytests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests; do not use unittest framework
Unit tests must achieve 60% code coverage; integration tests must achieve 10% coverage
Files:
tests/unit/models/config/test_authentication_configuration.pytests/unit/models/config/test_dump_configuration.pytests/unit/models/config/test_conversation_history.pytests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py
tests/**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Use
pytest-mockwith AsyncMock objects for mocking in tests
Files:
tests/unit/models/config/test_authentication_configuration.pytests/unit/models/config/test_dump_configuration.pytests/unit/models/config/test_conversation_history.pytests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
tests/unit/models/config/test_conversation_history.py (1)
src/models/config.py (1)
ConversationHistoryConfiguration(1146-1217)
tests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py (1)
src/models/config.py (1)
JwtRoleRule(633-752)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
- GitHub Check: build-pr
- GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / vertexai
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / vertexai
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / azure
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / azure
🔇 Additional comments (15)
tests/unit/models/config/test_dump_configuration.py (1)
35-37: LGTM: Helpful parameter documentation added.The Parameters section clearly documents the
tmp_pathfixture, improving test documentation clarity.tests/unit/models/config/test_conversation_history.py (6)
20-24: LGTM: Clear test documentation.The expanded docstring accurately describes the test's purpose and expected behavior.
30-38: LGTM: Comprehensive docstring addition.The docstring clearly explains the validation scenario and expected error message.
47-55: LGTM: Well-documented test with parameters.The docstring accurately describes the test behavior and documents the
subtestsparameter appropriately.
76-85: LGTM: Clear validation documentation.The docstring effectively explains the validation constraint being tested.
169-179: LGTM: Detailed assertions documented.The docstring clearly outlines both validation scenarios being tested.
207-215: LGTM: Accurate test description.The docstring correctly describes the SQLite configuration validation test.
tests/unit/models/config/test_authentication_configuration.py (5)
140-146: LGTM: Clear validation scenario documented.The docstring accurately describes the expected ValidationError when RH Identity configuration is missing.
180-188: LGTM: Comprehensive test documentation.The expanded docstring clearly explains the insufficient configuration scenario being tested.
217-225: LGTM: Test scenario well documented.The docstring accurately describes the test flow: configuration with JWK, removal of config, and expected error on access.
245-251: LGTM: Clear test purpose.The docstring effectively documents the K8S authentication module initialization test.
327-338: LGTM: Detailed configuration test documented.The docstring comprehensively describes the expected authentication configuration fields for RH Identity.
tests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py (3)
11-17: LGTM: Clear test documentation.The docstring accurately describes the expected ValidationError when no attributes are provided.
23-30: LGTM: Comprehensive docstring.The docstring clearly explains both the valid instantiation and the expected
compiled_regexbehavior for non-MATCH operators.
44-50: LGTM: Test purpose well documented.The docstring accurately describes the invalid JSONPath validation scenario.
8e074ae to
1ac114a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py (2)
128-141: Remove the "Raises:" section from test function docstring.The "Raises:" section (lines 138-141) is inappropriate for a test function docstring. Test functions use
pytest.raisesto verify that the code under test raises exceptions—they don't raise exceptions themselves in normal operation. This section may confuse readers about whether the test function or the code being tested raises the exception.Consider removing the "Raises:" section or incorporating it into the description naturally, e.g., "...the constructor must raise a ValidationError..."
📝 Suggested refactor
- """Check the JwtRoleRule config class. - - Ensure creating a JwtRoleRule with an invalid regex pattern for the MATCH - operator raises a ValidationError. - - Attempts to construct JwtRoleRule with operator set to - JsonPathOperator.MATCH and a malformed regex value; the constructor must - raise a ValidationError with message "Invalid regex pattern for MATCH - operator". - - Raises: - ValidationError: if the provided regex pattern for MATCH is invalid - (message contains "Invalid regex pattern for MATCH operator"). - """ + """Check the JwtRoleRule config class. + + Ensure creating a JwtRoleRule with an invalid regex pattern for the MATCH + operator raises a ValidationError. + + Attempts to construct JwtRoleRule with operator set to + JsonPathOperator.MATCH and a malformed regex value; the constructor must + raise a ValidationError with message "Invalid regex pattern for MATCH + operator". + """
61-125: Consider completing docstring enhancements for remaining tests.Five test functions still have minimal docstrings:
test_jwt_role_rule_no_roles_specified,test_jwt_role_rule_star_role_specified,test_jwt_role_rule_same_roles,test_jwt_role_rule_invalid_value, andtest_jwt_role_rule_valid_regexp.For consistency with the enhanced docstrings added in this PR, consider expanding these remaining test docstrings to match the detail level of the updated tests.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
tests/unit/models/config/test_conversation_history.pytests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/unit/models/config/test_conversation_history.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests; do not use unittest framework
Unit tests must achieve 60% code coverage; integration tests must achieve 10% coverage
Files:
tests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py
tests/**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Use
pytest-mockwith AsyncMock objects for mocking in tests
Files:
tests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py (1)
src/models/config.py (1)
JwtRoleRule(633-752)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
- GitHub Check: build-pr
- GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / vertexai
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / vertexai
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / azure
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / azure
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/unit/models/config/test_jwt_role_rule.py (3)
11-17: Well-documented test behavior.The enhanced docstring clearly describes the test's purpose and expected validation behavior.
23-30: Clear documentation of successful instantiation.The docstring effectively describes the valid construction scenario and the expected behavior of
compiled_regexfor non-MATCH operators.
44-50: Effective documentation of validation error case.The docstring clearly describes the invalid JSONPath scenario and expected validation error.
Description
LCORE-1071: docstrings for config unit tests (final version)
Type of change
Tools used to create PR
Related Tickets & Documents
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.