LCORE-1092: Updated docstring in authentication unit tests #945

tisnik · 2025-12-22T14:40:19Z

Description

LCORE-1092: Updated docstring in authentication unit tests

Type of change

Tools used to create PR

Identify any AI code assistants used in this PR (for transparency and review context)

Assisted-by: CodeRabbitAI
Generated by: CodeRabbitAI

Related Tickets & Documents

Related Issue #LCORE-1092

Summary by CodeRabbit

Documentation
- Expanded and clarified docstrings across authentication unit tests and fixtures, adding detailed descriptions of purposes, parameters, return values, mutation behavior, and expected error conditions. These updates improve test readability and intent without changing runtime behavior, public interfaces, or test logic.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

coderabbitai · 2025-12-22T14:40:28Z

Walkthrough

Expanded and clarified docstrings and inline test documentation across authentication unit tests. No function/class/method signatures, control flow, error handling, or runtime behavior were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
API key token test docstrings `tests/unit/authentication/test_api_key_token.py`	Expanded fixture docstring for `default_api_key_token_configuration` including a Returns section; no signature or behavior changes.
No-op token test docstrings `tests/unit/authentication/test_noop_with_token.py`	Expanded test docstring for `test_noop_with_token_auth_dependency_no_bearer` describing expected HTTPException details; no functional changes.
RH identity test docs `tests/unit/authentication/test_rh_identity.py`	Added/expanded docstrings and inline documentation for fixtures, helpers, and tests; no logic changes.
K8s test mock docstrings `tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py`	Expanded `__init__` docstrings for test mock classes (`MockK8sResponseStatus`, `MockK8sUser`, `MockK8sResponse`); signatures and behavior unchanged.
JWK token test docstrings `tests/unit/authentication/test_jwk_token.py`	Extensive expansion of docstrings for fixtures, helpers, token-generation helpers, and configuration builders; no runtime or signature changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Documentation-only changes across tests; no logic modifications.
Quick review items:
- Verify docstrings accurately describe existing behavior (esp. token examples and returned configuration values).
- Spot-check a few fixtures in test_jwk_token.py and test_api_key_token.py for consistency with implemented behavior.
- Confirm no accidental code edits beyond docstrings.

Possibly related PRs

Add support for JWT Token authentication with JWK #243: Related work touching tests/unit/authentication/test_jwk_token.py (original jwk_token tests/implementation).

Suggested labels

ok-to-test

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: updating docstrings across multiple authentication unit test files.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✨ Finishing touches

📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 07aa54e and 83ab0c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (2)

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests; do not use unittest framework
Unit tests must achieve 60% code coverage; integration tests must achieve 10% coverage

Files:

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py

tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Use pytest-mock with AsyncMock objects for mocking in tests

Files:

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py

🪛 GitHub Actions: Black

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py

[error] 1-1: Command failed: uv tool run black --check .; 1 file would be reformatted by Black. Black formatting check failed. Run 'uv tool run black' to fix formatting.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Python linter

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py

[error] 40-40: pylint: Line too long (C0301).

[error] 43-43: pylint: Line too long (C0301).

[error] 44-44: pylint: Line too long (C0301).

[error] 45-45: pylint: Line too long (C0301).

[error] 46-46: pylint: Line too long (C0301).

[error] 47-47: pylint: Line too long (C0301).

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)

GitHub Check: build-pr
GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / azure
GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / azure
GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci
GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci
GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / vertexai
GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / vertexai

🔇 Additional comments (1)

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py (1)

98-108: Documentation improvements look good.

The expanded docstring provides clear descriptions of initialization semantics and parameters, improving code maintainability.

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83ab0c3 and c2c71b0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

tests/unit/authentication/test_jwk_token.py
tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (2)

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests; do not use unittest framework
Unit tests must achieve 60% code coverage; integration tests must achieve 10% coverage

Files:

tests/unit/authentication/test_jwk_token.py

tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Use pytest-mock with AsyncMock objects for mocking in tests

Files:

tests/unit/authentication/test_jwk_token.py

🧬 Code graph analysis (1)

tests/unit/authentication/test_jwk_token.py (1)

src/models/config.py (1)

JwkConfiguration (874-899)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)

GitHub Check: build-pr
GitHub Check: unit_tests (3.12)
GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci
GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / vertexai
GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / vertexai
GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / azure
GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci
GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / azure

🔇 Additional comments (1)

tests/unit/authentication/test_jwk_token.py (1)

24-35: Excellent documentation improvements!

The expanded docstrings across all fixtures and helper functions significantly improve code maintainability and developer onboarding. The documentation consistently includes:

Clear purpose statements

Well-defined parameter descriptions

Explicit return value specifications

Edge case and behavior details where relevant

This makes the test suite much easier to understand and maintain.

Also applies to: 41-54, 75-83, 92-108, 122-178, 185-196, 201-219, 223-240, 245-259, 281-297, 301-318, 342-360, 368-385, 394-412, 477-494, 522-535, 563-588, 595-613, 640-652, 657-670, 675-682, 687-694, 699-709, 720-750, 760-788, 795-812

coderabbitai · 2025-12-22T14:58:30Z

tests/unit/authentication/test_jwk_token.py

+    """Dummy request with no token.
+
+    Create a FastAPI Request whose Authorization header uses a non-Bearer scheme.
+
+    Returns:
+        Request: A request with an Authorization header set to "NotBearer anything".
+    """


⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Correct the misleading docstring.

The docstring at line 264 states "Dummy request with no token" but the fixture actually creates a request with an Authorization header that uses a non-Bearer scheme ("NotBearer anything"). The description should accurately reflect that this is a request with an invalid authorization scheme, not a missing token.

🔎 Suggested fix

- """Dummy request with no token. + """Dummy request with a non-Bearer authorization scheme.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

"""Dummy request with no token.

Create a FastAPI Request whose Authorization header uses a non-Bearer scheme.

Returns:

Request: A request with an Authorization header set to "NotBearer anything".

"""

"""Dummy request with a non-Bearer authorization scheme.

Create a FastAPI Request whose Authorization header uses a non-Bearer scheme.

Returns:

Request: A request with an Authorization header set to "NotBearer anything".

"""

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In tests/unit/authentication/test_jwk_token.py around lines 264 to 270, the docstring currently says "Dummy request with no token" but the fixture actually builds a Request with an Authorization header using a non-Bearer scheme ("NotBearer anything"); update the docstring to accurately describe that this fixture returns a request with an invalid/non-Bearer authorization scheme (or an Authorization header with a non-Bearer token) so the docstring reflects the test intent.

Updated docstring in test_rh_identity.py and test_noop_with_token.py

07aa54e

Updated docstring in test_k8s.py

83ab0c3

coderabbitai bot reviewed Dec 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py Show resolved Hide resolved

tests/unit/authentication/test_k8s.py Show resolved Hide resolved

Docstrings for test_jwk_token.py unit tests

c2c71b0

coderabbitai bot reviewed Dec 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

tisnik merged commit 8bd7fc6 into lightspeed-core:main Dec 22, 2025
19 of 27 checks passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

LCORE-1092: Updated docstring in authentication unit tests #945

LCORE-1092: Updated docstring in authentication unit tests #945

Uh oh!

tisnik commented Dec 22, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Dec 22, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

LCORE-1092: Updated docstring in authentication unit tests #945

LCORE-1092: Updated docstring in authentication unit tests #945

Uh oh!

Conversation

tisnik commented Dec 22, 2025 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Type of change

Tools used to create PR

Related Tickets & Documents

Summary by CodeRabbit

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Walkthrough

Changes

Estimated code review effort

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Dec 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

tisnik commented Dec 22, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2025 •

edited

Loading